2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0360-1315(03)00015-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An activity theory approach to research of ICT integration in Singapore schools

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
74
0
6

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 117 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
74
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…These factors and actors clearly impact school and teacher activities and can lead to a substantial misalignment between what more distant participants envision and what actually takes place in schools (Karasavvidis 2009). Lim and Hang (2003) demonstrate the use of CHAT during a case study using interviews with key actors to identify contradictions that emerge between different levels of the school system. A similar methodology was used by Demiraslan and Usluel (2008), who investigated ICT integration in two schools using the perspective of teachers as a starting point in identifying relations and contradictions in different school activity systems.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These factors and actors clearly impact school and teacher activities and can lead to a substantial misalignment between what more distant participants envision and what actually takes place in schools (Karasavvidis 2009). Lim and Hang (2003) demonstrate the use of CHAT during a case study using interviews with key actors to identify contradictions that emerge between different levels of the school system. A similar methodology was used by Demiraslan and Usluel (2008), who investigated ICT integration in two schools using the perspective of teachers as a starting point in identifying relations and contradictions in different school activity systems.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was a far-reaching perspective, developed long before today's technological capabilities expanded the possibilities we see today. Studies on activity theory in education have been growing (Levy, 2008;Lim & Hang, 2003;Mlitwa, 2007;Scanlon & Issroff, 2005), as well as in the area of system design (Mwanza, 2001), and in the use of mobile devices in workplace settings (Marken, 2006).…”
Section: Theoretical Foundations and Definitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While not applying the framework in its entirety, the study drew on the principles of tool mediation and contradiction (or tension Á Dippe 2006;and resistance Á Lim and Hang 2003), to investigate why attempts to engage students more interactively in the workshops and labs, and move teaching practice towards more constructive, student-centred pedagogical models, were largely unsuccessful. Activity Theory has been frequently used to examine the mediating influence of technologies on environments, systems and programmes (Benson, Lawler, and Whitworth 2008;Hardman 2005;Lim and Hang 2003;Rodriguez-Manzanares 2007, 2008). However, as Lim and Hang (2003) comment, its potential is much wider than this, allowing ''one to observe the actual processes by which activities shape and are shaped by their context'' (p. 51).…”
Section: Analytical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Activity Theory has been frequently used to examine the mediating influence of technologies on environments, systems and programmes (Benson, Lawler, and Whitworth 2008;Hardman 2005;Lim and Hang 2003;Rodriguez-Manzanares 2007, 2008). However, as Lim and Hang (2003) comment, its potential is much wider than this, allowing ''one to observe the actual processes by which activities shape and are shaped by their context'' (p. 51). This notion of ''contextual effect'' was particularly valuable to this study, as it provided a lens through which to observe and analyse how students reacted to the advent of the videoconference workshops and labs, and constructed their perception of their effectiveness and value.…”
Section: Analytical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%