2017
DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/896/1/012020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An adapted yield criterion for the evolution of subsequent yield surfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(5 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The velocity of the punch was set to v punch = 2000 mm/s, accordingly the drawing depth s D of 50 mm was reached after t = 0.025 s which is also the termination time. A comparison of the conventional approach (Yld2000‐2d) and the adapted approach according to Küsters et al 38 is shown in Figure 10 based on the differences visible by the illustration of the triaxiality.…”
Section: Numerical Evaluation and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The velocity of the punch was set to v punch = 2000 mm/s, accordingly the drawing depth s D of 50 mm was reached after t = 0.025 s which is also the termination time. A comparison of the conventional approach (Yld2000‐2d) and the adapted approach according to Küsters et al 38 is shown in Figure 10 based on the differences visible by the illustration of the triaxiality.…”
Section: Numerical Evaluation and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The implemented subroutine used during the calculation is based on the cutting‐plane algorithm based on Ortiz and Simo 43 . For additional information regarding this approach, please refer to the initial yield criterion 44 and to the specific publication provided by Küsters et al 38 …”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations