2011 International Conference on Innovations in Information Technology 2011
DOI: 10.1109/innovations.2011.5893853
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An adaptive bandwidth borrowing-based Call Admission Control scheme for multi-class service wireless cellular networks

Abstract: This work describes an adaptive Call Admission Control (CAC) scheme for multi-class service wireless cellular networks. The proposed scheme uses complete sharing approach of the available bandwidth among all traffic classes. The proposed adaptive CAC is achieved through call bandwidth borrowing and call preemption techniques based on the priorities of the traffic classes. The CAC scheme achieves the QoS in each class through mechanisms for call bandwidth degradation, and call bandwidth upgrading based on Min-M… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For further details, refer to the work of Al Khanjari [14]. Scenario 1 is a Complete Bandwidth Sharing scheme with No Adaptation (CBS-NA) that only admits the calls if there is an available bandwidth; otherwise, the calls are blocked or dropped.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For further details, refer to the work of Al Khanjari [14]. Scenario 1 is a Complete Bandwidth Sharing scheme with No Adaptation (CBS-NA) that only admits the calls if there is an available bandwidth; otherwise, the calls are blocked or dropped.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section, a number of these cases are carefully selected and discussed in the coming paragraphs, because of the limited space. For further details, refer to the work of Al Khanjari [14]. In all the conducted tests, the ratios for the CBR, VBR, and UBR call classes are set to 0.5, 0.25, and 0.25, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The grade of service of a wireless mobile network can be defined in terms of the blocking probability of new call and the dropping probability of handoff call.In handoff strategy, in order to improve the two indicators, two priorities are considered in many handoff strategies. Some handoff strategy taking into account different priorities between different service types have been proposed (Krishna et al, 2009;Al Khanjari et al, 2011;Suleiman et al, 2011), the different priorities between handoff calls and new calls other handoff are considered in other strategies. A new call being blocked is not as disastrous as a handoff call being dropped, so these strategies (Idil and Muhammed, 2007;Sheu et al, 2007;Nasr et al, 2010) consist of giving higher priority to handoff call than new call.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several schemes have been proposed in the literature for pre‐emption control in different networks . A priority‐scaled pre‐emption scheme for Third Generation Partnership Project Long Term Evolution networks using allocation and retention priority (ARP) has been proposed in .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%