2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2020.03.104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An adaptive clustering-based evolutionary algorithm for many-objective optimization problems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where the neighbor set of pi includes T solutions with the closest diversity distance in (13) to itself. Note that T is set as 0.1 N in this paper as suggested in [49]- [50]. In addition, due to page limitations, a parameter sensitivity analysis of T is given in Table S1 of supplementary file.…”
Section: The Convergence and Diversity Estimation Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where the neighbor set of pi includes T solutions with the closest diversity distance in (13) to itself. Note that T is set as 0.1 N in this paper as suggested in [49]- [50]. In addition, due to page limitations, a parameter sensitivity analysis of T is given in Table S1 of supplementary file.…”
Section: The Convergence and Diversity Estimation Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MaOEA/AC [12] is a many-objective evolutionary algorithm that uses an adaptive clustering-based selection strategy. The population of solutions is divided into N clusters.…”
Section: E Maoea/acmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To enhance the exploitative capability of GDE3, we incorporate a local search strategy, which improves the updated solution at hand by searching and replacing it with a better solution in the neighborhood. We have done experiments using DNA sequence data sets of different size and compared the results of our proposed MGDE3 with well cited multi and many-objective evolutionary algorithms (MaOEAs) like NSGA-III [6], NSGA-II [7], MOEA/D [8], DBEA [9], GDE3 [10], RVEA [11], and MaOEA/AC [12]. The results show that MGDE3 has better performance than the compared methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are errors in other parameters calculated by the geometric reasoning method, and the feature recognition system based on a prompt requires prompt features in the workpiece. Therefore, 3D vision technology must be used for deep and accurate machining [27][28][29][30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%