“…The first, which we will call the adaptive mesh approach, includes more meshpoints in the mesh wherever the approximate solution of (C) has large gradients; meshpoints are added and removed from the mesh when deemed necessary, but meshpoints are generally not moved from one timestep to the next, and the number of meshpoints may vary greatly over time. Öliger and his students [1], [2], [22], Lucier [18], and others (see [12]) have taken this approach. Osher and Sanders [24] have proved convergence for a method that uses this approach for conservation laws, but the rate of convergence of their method when used with any specific mesh selection algorithm is unknown.…”