1998
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1099-0887(199807)14:7<621::aid-cnm174>3.0.co;2-u
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An adaptive finite element procedure for the image segmentation problem

Abstract: SUMMARYThe image segmentation problem in computer vision is considered. Given a two-dimensional domain D and a function de®ned on it (the original image), the problem is to obtain a`cartoon' associated with this function, namely to ®nd a set of inner boundaries which divide D into subdomains (objects) in an optimal way. The optimality criterion used here is given by the Mumford±Shah (MS) and Blake±Zisserman model, which leads to a strongly non-linear problem. Related problems appear in multiphase continuum mec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While the use of finite-elements and adaptive strategies is not new in the image segmentation context, see e.g. [4][5][6][7][8], those methods are rather complex as they are framed in a variational formulation and their objective is different from the one proposed here: the given image is split in several parts or components that can be easily identified via the location of edges. Hence those methodologies aim at locally reconstructing the profiles of these regions, but they do not address the problem of the classification of such regions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the use of finite-elements and adaptive strategies is not new in the image segmentation context, see e.g. [4][5][6][7][8], those methods are rather complex as they are framed in a variational formulation and their objective is different from the one proposed here: the given image is split in several parts or components that can be easily identified via the location of edges. Hence those methodologies aim at locally reconstructing the profiles of these regions, but they do not address the problem of the classification of such regions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the latter case, particular attention has been devoted to the local control of the geometric features of the mesh (i.e., shape, size and orientation of the elements), by means of anisotropic elements stretched along the direction orthogonal to the gradient of the quantity of interest [44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55]. It is worth noticing that the coupling of finite element approximations and mesh adaptation in the context of image segmentation was previously explored in [56][57][58] and [59][60][61] in isotropic and anisotropic settings, respectively. Nonetheless, all the above models were devised for images featuring sharp interfaces and regions with homogeneous intensities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%