2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.dam.2006.07.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An adaptive memory algorithm for the k-coloring problem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
59
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Columns 3 and 4 give the results of the CEGPbased and URP-based ILS algorithms respectively, together with the CPU time in minutes (in brackets). Columns 5 to 11 give the results of seven reference algorithms, including four local search algorithms [1,3,6,13] as well as three hybrid algorithms [7,8,9].…”
Section: Experimental Results and Comparisonsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Columns 3 and 4 give the results of the CEGPbased and URP-based ILS algorithms respectively, together with the CPU time in minutes (in brackets). Columns 5 to 11 give the results of seven reference algorithms, including four local search algorithms [1,3,6,13] as well as three hybrid algorithms [7,8,9].…”
Section: Experimental Results and Comparisonsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the second group of experiments, algorithm 4, which outperforms the other proposed algorithms, is tested on a subset of hard-to-color benchmarks like Leighton, DSJ and Wap. The performance of algorithm 4 is measured in terms of the time and the number of colors required for coloring the graphs, and compared with CHECKCOL [8], GLS [7], ILS [4], TPA [5] and AMACOL [6].…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is shown that by a proper choice of the parameters of the proposed algorithms, the probability of approximating the optimal solution is as close to unity as possible. The performance of the last proposed algorithm is measured through experimental results, in terms of the time and the number of colors required for coloring the graphs, and compared with CHECKCOL [8], GLS [7], ILS [4], TPA [5] and AMACOL [6]. The results show that the proposed algorithm outperforms the others.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Many of the bestknown results available today have been obtained with hybrid methods that employ Tabu Search as a local optimizer [15,17,27,26,32]. One observes that classical TS coloring algorithms are quite simple and "lightweight": they do not make use of "heavy machineries" such as linear programming relaxations, distributed computing, ant swarms, evolutionary computing, niching or fitness sharing techniques, etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…some of the best are RLX and XRLF [23]), (ii) local search (tabu search [20,12,3], simulated annealing [5,23], iterative local search [30,7,6], variable neighborhood search [1,19], local search with forward checking [35], distance and position guided search [33], etc. ), (iii) population-based hybrid algorithms [29,13,10,15,17,27,26,32,34], (iv) neural networks approaches [22,36], (v) swarm intelligence algorithms [8,11,4,31], (vi) independent set extraction [38], and (vii) distributed and hybrid quantum annealing [37].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%