2007
DOI: 10.1007/s11075-007-9071-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An adaptive spectral least-squares scheme for the Burgers equation

Abstract: A least-squares spectral collocation method for the one-dimensional inviscid Burgers equation is proposed. This model problem shows the stability and high accuracy of these schemes for nonlinear hyperbolic scalar equations. Here we make use of a least-squares spectral approach which was already used in an earlier paper for discontinuous and singular perturbation problems (Heinrichs, J. Comput. Appl. Math. 157:329-345, 2003). The domain is decomposed in subintervals where continuity is enforced at the interface… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(13) subject to the algebraic constraints of Eqs. (14)- (17). Just as in the continuoustime optimal control problem of Eqs.…”
Section: Radau Pseudospectral Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(13) subject to the algebraic constraints of Eqs. (14)- (17). Just as in the continuoustime optimal control problem of Eqs.…”
Section: Radau Pseudospectral Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous numerical algorithms were exploited to numerically solve NLEEs especially Burgers' equation to achieve minimized errors with respect to analytical solutions. Finite difference and other modifications, 18–24 finite element and B‐spline finite element, 25–27 spectral least squares method, 28–30 variational iteration method, 31,32 Adomian–Pade technique, 33 homotopy analysis, 34 and automatic differentiation method 35 are examples of such numerical techniques. Moreover, miscellaneous numerical techniques have been employed either for Burgers' equation or other engineering applications such as boundary element techniques for cavitation of hydrofoils, 36,37 step cubic polynomial, 38 technique of modified diffusion coefficient for studying convection diffusion equation, 39 and differential quadrature for functionally graded nanobeams 40,41 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Up to now, there are already a variety of analytical methods to solve (1.1)–(1.3), such as Cole–Hopf transformation [1, 2], variational iteration method [3], Adomian's decomposition method [4], and so on. For the numerical methods, there are finite difference method [5, 6], finite element method [7, 8], multiquadric RBF method [9], Haar wavelets method [10], adaptive spectral least‐squares method [11], high order splitting method [12, 13], Haar wavelet quasilinearization approach [14], weighted average differential quadrature method [15], exponential modified cubic B‐spline differential quadrature method [16], meshfree methods [17], and so on. However, most of the numerical methods focus on the L 2 ‐error convergence or lack of numerical analysis, and few works concentrate on the L ∞ ‐error convergence, especially for the nonlinear implicit schemes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%