2021 5th International Conference on Electrical Engineering and Information Communication Technology (ICEEICT) 2021
DOI: 10.1109/iceeict53905.2021.9667850
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Adaptive System for Detecting Driving Abnormality of Individual Drivers Using Gaussian Mixture Model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to the abovementioned clustering algorithms, it employs soft clustering, a data point may be contained in different clusters with different probabilities. Shakib et al [77] holds that sudden changes in driving style can damage system stability, as each data point can only be associated with one driving style in the case of hard clustering, which leads to difficulty in monitoring abnormal driving behavior, i.e, short-term abnormal driving style. Thus, he used a GMM-based clustering algorithm to recognize short-term driving styles.…”
Section: • Gmmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to the abovementioned clustering algorithms, it employs soft clustering, a data point may be contained in different clusters with different probabilities. Shakib et al [77] holds that sudden changes in driving style can damage system stability, as each data point can only be associated with one driving style in the case of hard clustering, which leads to difficulty in monitoring abnormal driving behavior, i.e, short-term abnormal driving style. Thus, he used a GMM-based clustering algorithm to recognize short-term driving styles.…”
Section: • Gmmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…of RPM, and the average speed). Shakib et al [17] employed the maximal information coefficient (MIC) to choose features while extending to the complex input. Multiple models, including GMM, Fuzzy C-means, and K-means, are used to assess the complex input features, with compelling results in each case.…”
Section: Gaussian Mixture Model (Gmm)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The versatility of the collected vehicle data (e.g., controller area network (CAN) bus, image, gyroscope) is prone to indigestion in the mathematical-based traditional models. Multi-dimensional time-series data are challenging to apply to the majority of statistical models, including hidden Markov model (HMM) [9][10][11][12][13][14], Gaussian mixture model (GMM) [15][16][17][18][19], support vector machine (SVM) [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27], Naive Bayes (NB) [28][29][30], fuzzy logic (FL) [31][32][33][34][35][36], and k-nearest neighbor (KNN) [20,[37][38][39][40]. The deep learning based models, including convolutional neural network (CNN) [41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48], recurrent neural network (RNN) [49][50][51][52][53]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Grounded in information theory principles, these criteria strike a balance between model fit and model complexity, facilitating the determination of the most suitable clustering solution. This solution is also proposed in [29] where the appropriate GMM number of clusters was decided to identify the driving style of car drivers. To further analyze the best scenario, the AIC [27] and BIC [28] scores were implemented.…”
Section: Gmm Clusteringmentioning
confidence: 99%