2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultras.2008.10.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An adaptive threshold filter for ultrasound signal rejection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The quantitative analysis of the signals showed that the C 1 and C 2 account for up to 90% of the amplitude of the backscattered signals, as shown in Figure 5. This finding agreed well with the previous study [14], supporting the selection of C 1 and C 2 for the definition of the IER. Moreover, the results in Figure 4 further showed that the summation of each IMF multiplied by the gain factor equals the signal multiplied using the same gain, demonstrating the reasonability of Equations (12) and (13).…”
Section: Experiments On a Tissue-mimicking Phantomsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The quantitative analysis of the signals showed that the C 1 and C 2 account for up to 90% of the amplitude of the backscattered signals, as shown in Figure 5. This finding agreed well with the previous study [14], supporting the selection of C 1 and C 2 for the definition of the IER. Moreover, the results in Figure 4 further showed that the summation of each IMF multiplied by the gain factor equals the signal multiplied using the same gain, demonstrating the reasonability of Equations (12) and (13).…”
Section: Experiments On a Tissue-mimicking Phantomsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Notably, the EMD decomposed image data to produce the IMFs from high-to low-frequency components. The first IMF was the data with the highest-frequency components compared with the other IMFs; therefore, the signal waveforms in the C1 image were similar to those of the original backscattered RF echoes but more symmetrical in the upper and lower envelopes [14,17]. This also explains why the other IMF-based images (C2, C3 and C4 images in Figure6) exhibited poorer spatial resolutions compared with the C1 image.…”
Section: Experiments On a Tissue-mimicking Phantommentioning
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Re cently, we de vel oped an adap tive thresh old fil ter based on a noise-as sisted em pir i cal mode de com po si tion (EMD) of ul tra sonic ech oes to re ject small sig nals in B-scans with out chang ing the char ac ter is tics of the pre served back scat tered data. 18 Our pi lot stud ies showed that the adap tive thresh old fil ter might have the abil ity to im prove the sen si tiv ity of the Nakagami pa ram e ter to de tect the vari a tion in scat terer con cen tra tions with a tol er a ble Nakagami pa ram e ter over es ti ma tion. The EMD is the key part of the Hilbert-Huang transform (HHT), pro posed as an adap tive time-fre quency anal y sis method for non lin ear and nonstationary data.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%