2022
DOI: 10.3390/su142013023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Adaptive Traffic-Calming Measure and Effectiveness Evaluation in a Large Urban Complex of Shanghai, China

Abstract: The rapid development of the motor vehicle brings convenience to our life; however, it also increases the burden on traffic networks and the environment, especially when road space is limited. Traffic calming has proved to be an effective solution for the improvement of traffic safety and travel quality. However, most traffic-calming measures are investigated and carried out without any adaptive ability. Such measures cannot adapt to changing traffic requirements. There is a mismatch between static measures an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 22 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While traffic-calming measures (TCMs) have been in place for several years, they have gained renewed attention as a successful strategy to address the evolving challenges of energy-efficient and smart cities. Numerous studies have emphasized the potential benefits of TCMs in mitigating the adverse impacts of motorized traffic on urban centers, ultimately enhancing general traffic conditions and the overall well-being of citizens [3,11,[57][58][59].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While traffic-calming measures (TCMs) have been in place for several years, they have gained renewed attention as a successful strategy to address the evolving challenges of energy-efficient and smart cities. Numerous studies have emphasized the potential benefits of TCMs in mitigating the adverse impacts of motorized traffic on urban centers, ultimately enhancing general traffic conditions and the overall well-being of citizens [3,11,[57][58][59].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%