2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00211-020-01104-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An ADMM numerical approach to linear parabolic state constrained optimal control problems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The discrete problems (4.4) have been solved by reformulating the necessary and sufficient optimality condition (4.5) as a system of equations by means of the complementarity function Φ(a, b) := min(a, b), and by subsequently applying a semismooth Newton method with tolerance 10 −10 . For an alternative to this solution approach, we refer to [31], where an ADMM-scheme for state-constrained parabolic optimal control problems is developed. We would like to point out that the calculation of the y D -integral in (4.5) was carried out with a subdivided three-point Gauss-rule in space and time in our numerical experiments (i.e., overall twelve nodes per triangle and 6 nodes per time interval).…”
Section: Numerical Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The discrete problems (4.4) have been solved by reformulating the necessary and sufficient optimality condition (4.5) as a system of equations by means of the complementarity function Φ(a, b) := min(a, b), and by subsequently applying a semismooth Newton method with tolerance 10 −10 . For an alternative to this solution approach, we refer to [31], where an ADMM-scheme for state-constrained parabolic optimal control problems is developed. We would like to point out that the calculation of the y D -integral in (4.5) was carried out with a subdivided three-point Gauss-rule in space and time in our numerical experiments (i.e., overall twelve nodes per triangle and 6 nodes per time interval).…”
Section: Numerical Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For additional comments on this topic, see also the discussions in the introductions of [31,37,49,50]. The strategy that is most commonly used in the literature to circumvent the above difficulties surrounding the Slater condition in the analysis of parabolic distributed optimal control problems of the type (P) is to employ regularization or penalization techniques that either incorporate the constraint y ≥ ψ into the objective function or introduce artificial bounds on the controls u which ensure a higher regularity of the attainable states y.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One can extend our algorithm to solve state constrained parabolic optimal control problem without much more effort. We compared the extended algorithm with ADMM described in [19].…”
Section: ≤ Tolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The initial values are set as u = 0, z = 0 and λ = 0. For more detail, we refer to [19]. ≤ tol where g k = {g k n } N −1 n=0 denotes gradient at k-th iteration.…”
Section: ≤ Tolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, the ADMM and its variants have been applied to solve some optimal control problems constrained by time-independent PDEs in, e.g., [2,27,56]. In [26], the ADMM was applied to parabolic optimal control problems with state constraints, and its convergence is proved without any assumption on the existence and regularity of the Lagrange multiplier. In [24], the Peaceman-Rachford splitting method (see [46]) which is closely related to the ADMM was suggested to solve approximate controllability problems of parabolic equations numerically.…”
Section: Remarks On the Direct Application Of Admmmentioning
confidence: 99%