2002
DOI: 10.1007/s540-002-8098-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An adult with ARDS managed with high-frequency oscillatory ventilation and prone position

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The objective of our study was to evaluate the effects of prone positioning on gas-exchange, hemodynamics and respiratory parameters in HFOV-ventilated pigs with severe lavage induced acute lung injury [ 16 ]. We hypothesized, that during HFOV oxygenation can be improved at a lower P mean with the animals positioned prone than supine.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The objective of our study was to evaluate the effects of prone positioning on gas-exchange, hemodynamics and respiratory parameters in HFOV-ventilated pigs with severe lavage induced acute lung injury [ 16 ]. We hypothesized, that during HFOV oxygenation can be improved at a lower P mean with the animals positioned prone than supine.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, when we changed from CMV without PEEP, we found decreased CO at higher mean airway pressure settings. The initial mean airway pressure for HFOV has usually been set at 2-5 cm H 2 O higher than that observed during CMV [9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. When compared with the initial mean airway pressure used during HFOV in other experimental and clinical studies, the initial mean airway pressure of 25 cmH 2 O used in the present study was slightly higher than the recommended initial 7.45 ± 0.08 CMV (6 ml·kg −1 ) with PEEP (before HFOV) 99.6 ± 1.9 54.8 ± 5.6 7.17 ± 0.07 HFOV (mean airway pressure/stroke volume) 25 cmH 2 O/150 ml 159.2 ± 38.5* 26.0 ± 3.3* ; ** 7.46 ± 0.08* ; ** 18 cmH 2 O/150 ml 232.6 ± 97.9* 22.9 ± 4.6* ; ** 7.53 ± 0.14* ; ** 12 cmH 2 O/150 ml 85.9 ± 5.9 24.9 ± 8.3* ; ** 7.53 ± 0.2* ; ** CMV (6 ml·kg −1 ) with PEEP (after HFOV)…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…HFO ventilation (HFOV) has been demonstrated to have benefi ts over conventional mechanical ventilation (CMV) in neonatal models of ALI [7], and in neonatal patient populations [8]. Despite disappointing results for HFOV in early clinical trials in adults with ARDS [9][10][11], there is renewed interest in the application of HFOV in adults with ALI [5,[12][13][14][15], because of the increasing evidence of the usefulness of the open-lung strategy in the management of ARDS, as described above.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In HFOV, lungs are inflated with a tidal volume (V T ) less than anatomic deadspace and at a high respiratory rate (3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20) [1]. The advantage of HFOV is that, with the maintenance of high mean airway pressure (PEEP), it can ventilate patients without raising peak alveolar pressure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%