“…The objective of our study was to evaluate the effects of prone positioning on gas-exchange, hemodynamics and respiratory parameters in HFOV-ventilated pigs with severe lavage induced acute lung injury [ 16 ]. We hypothesized, that during HFOV oxygenation can be improved at a lower P mean with the animals positioned prone than supine.…”
Background: This animal study was conducted to assess the combined effects of high frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV) and prone positioning on pulmonary gas exchange and hemodynamics.
“…The objective of our study was to evaluate the effects of prone positioning on gas-exchange, hemodynamics and respiratory parameters in HFOV-ventilated pigs with severe lavage induced acute lung injury [ 16 ]. We hypothesized, that during HFOV oxygenation can be improved at a lower P mean with the animals positioned prone than supine.…”
Background: This animal study was conducted to assess the combined effects of high frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV) and prone positioning on pulmonary gas exchange and hemodynamics.
“…Indeed, when we changed from CMV without PEEP, we found decreased CO at higher mean airway pressure settings. The initial mean airway pressure for HFOV has usually been set at 2-5 cm H 2 O higher than that observed during CMV [9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. When compared with the initial mean airway pressure used during HFOV in other experimental and clinical studies, the initial mean airway pressure of 25 cmH 2 O used in the present study was slightly higher than the recommended initial 7.45 ± 0.08 CMV (6 ml·kg −1 ) with PEEP (before HFOV) 99.6 ± 1.9 54.8 ± 5.6 7.17 ± 0.07 HFOV (mean airway pressure/stroke volume) 25 cmH 2 O/150 ml 159.2 ± 38.5* 26.0 ± 3.3* ; ** 7.46 ± 0.08* ; ** 18 cmH 2 O/150 ml 232.6 ± 97.9* 22.9 ± 4.6* ; ** 7.53 ± 0.14* ; ** 12 cmH 2 O/150 ml 85.9 ± 5.9 24.9 ± 8.3* ; ** 7.53 ± 0.2* ; ** CMV (6 ml·kg −1 ) with PEEP (after HFOV)…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…HFO ventilation (HFOV) has been demonstrated to have benefi ts over conventional mechanical ventilation (CMV) in neonatal models of ALI [7], and in neonatal patient populations [8]. Despite disappointing results for HFOV in early clinical trials in adults with ARDS [9][10][11], there is renewed interest in the application of HFOV in adults with ALI [5,[12][13][14][15], because of the increasing evidence of the usefulness of the open-lung strategy in the management of ARDS, as described above.…”
“…In HFOV, lungs are inflated with a tidal volume (V T ) less than anatomic deadspace and at a high respiratory rate (3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20) [1]. The advantage of HFOV is that, with the maintenance of high mean airway pressure (PEEP), it can ventilate patients without raising peak alveolar pressure.…”
Because it is able to deliver comparably greater V(T), R100 may be a better choice for HFOV in critical ARDS patients. Better proportionality may be a result of more effective amplitude titration for adjusting PaCO₂ during oscillation.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.