2017 International Conference on Intelligent Computing and Control Systems (ICICCS) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/iccons.2017.8250624
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An advanced algorithm for load balancing in cloud computing using fuzzy technique

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our proposed method each host's CPU utilization has been estimated so as to detect whether the host is overloaded or not. In majority of the existing works [11][12][13][14][15][20][21][22], authors have applied static threshold to identify overloaded node. However, in practice, cloud infrastructure, especially IaaS undergoes dynamic load condition and therefore static threshold based overload node identification can be an optimal solution.…”
Section: Dual-level Dynamic Thresholding Assisted Host Overload Detecmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In our proposed method each host's CPU utilization has been estimated so as to detect whether the host is overloaded or not. In majority of the existing works [11][12][13][14][15][20][21][22], authors have applied static threshold to identify overloaded node. However, in practice, cloud infrastructure, especially IaaS undergoes dynamic load condition and therefore static threshold based overload node identification can be an optimal solution.…”
Section: Dual-level Dynamic Thresholding Assisted Host Overload Detecmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Literatures [21] reveal that migrating VM to a suitable host or PM is a NP-hard problem, which can be significantly solved using meta-heuristics models such as Evolutionary Computing (EC). Towards this objective a few efforts have been made to use PSO [11][12][13][14][15], ACS [20][21][22], GA [16][17][18][19], HBF [23], CS [24], etc., where these approaches have been applied mainly for identifying the sub-optimal solution (i.e., suitable host). Undeniably, these approaches require certain Objective Functions (OF) to maintain optimal migration scheduling, for which CPU availability has been a most-used approach, though, in this paper we intend to use dynamic node (host) parameters such as bandwidth availability as well as CPU utilization at VM to perform migration decision (say, OF).…”
Section: Enhanced Aga Based Vm Migration For Sla-centric Load Balancingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…IoT data are stored and processed in cloud data centres. But, cloud computing is only suitable for tasks requiring high latency and less service availability [109]. The growing IoT devices require a platform that reduces data transmission and energy consumption by cloud data centres.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Big data centers in clouds are provided with a dynamical load balance scheduling approach that increases network throughput and dynamically balances workload. This process implements two representative OpenFlow architectures, namely fully populated networks and fat-tree networks, which are dynamically migrated flows that require a high bandwidth in congested servers [13,14]. A stochastic load balancing scheme is used to reduce VM migration by considering the distance between source and destination physical machines [14].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%