An advanced netnographic framework for analyzing brand community overlap conflicts in the phygital brand community (PBC) environment

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to introduce and define the concept of phygital brand community (PBC). It discusses the potential conflicts that can arise from engaging in multiple PBCs and propose an enriched netnographic methodological approach to explore the role of PBC engagement overlap and its influence on the phygital experience. Design/methodology/approach Following a critical analysis of the inherent limitations of netnographic methodological approaches in the context of PBCs, this study develops an enriched netnographic research protocol that accounts for the challenges of engagement overlap among PBCs. Findings This study proposes two methods of analysis, namely, “participatory netnography” and “witness netnography,” which are derived from a mixed-methodology approach that integrates elements of netnography. Research limitations/implications The findings of this study underscore the requisite methodological refinements imperative for enhancing netnographic analysis, particularly in its application for a better comprehension of individual behaviors within the realm of PBCs. In pursuit of this objective, the identified adjustments encompass ethical considerations, evaluation methods and their application in a digital milieu, where intricate mechanics and technologies frequently elude conventional methodologies. Originality/value In this study, the authors present a novel conceptualization of PBCs, highlighting their role and development, as well as the challenges they pose. To adequately capture the impact of PBC engagement overlap, the authors propose the need for an enriched mixed-methodological approach.

Guest editorial: The phygital research paradigm: philosophical foundations for examining consumer experiences and behaviors in hybrid physical-digital realms

“…For instance, Levy and Sabri (2024) article serves as an example of applying the phygital research paradigm. The article examines brand communities within both physical and digital domains, using liquid ontology principles.…”