2016
DOI: 10.1007/s10973-016-5473-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An advanced reaction model determination methodology in solid-state kinetics based on Arrhenius parameters variation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Various methods have been proposed over the last few years to estimate the reaction model. The detailed explanation of these different methods can be found elsewhere . In this research work, a recently developed regression method was used .…”
Section: Theoreticalmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Various methods have been proposed over the last few years to estimate the reaction model. The detailed explanation of these different methods can be found elsewhere . In this research work, a recently developed regression method was used .…”
Section: Theoreticalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The detailed explanation of these different methods can be found elsewhere. [29][30][31][32][33] In this research work, a recently developed regression method was used. [27] The method utilizes the Šesták-Berggren (SB) equation to develop Equation (10).…”
Section: Reaction Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The kinetic analysis of solid-state material in thermal decomposition can be expressed as Eq. (1) [13,[15][16][17] …”
Section: Kinetic Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Determining the Reaction Model. Shahcheraghi et al 39 proposed a method to determine reaction model from Arrhenius parameters obtained by isoconversional methods. In this method, change of the reaction rate with change of conversion or d(dα/dt)/dα is evaluated by differentiating eq 2.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results are shown in Figure 5. According to Figure 5, the difference between the maximum and minimum values E α in the 0.7 < α < 1 was more than 30% of the average activation energy; 39,46 therefore, this region was considered as an extra step in the reaction pathway for further investigation of its mechanism. Consequently, oxidation reactions of nano + oil were divided into four reaction regions while oxidation of crude oil was divided into the same three steps as before.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%