DOI: 10.1016/s1746-9791(05)01103-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Affective Events Theory-Based Conceptual Model of Emotional Ambivalence in the Context of Personal Web-Usage Monitoring

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Existing research does not adequately explain the mechanisms of how affective ambivalence influences individuals’ psychological states; it is not clear whether affective ambivalence has positive or negative effects on individuals’ development. In addition, Stratton (2015) proposed an affective events theory-based conceptual model of emotional ambivalence that describes the determinants of emotional ambivalence and their effects. This model depicts the process that individuals undergo after experiencing emotional ambivalence: paralysis, reappraisal, and finally affective-driven behavior(s).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Existing research does not adequately explain the mechanisms of how affective ambivalence influences individuals’ psychological states; it is not clear whether affective ambivalence has positive or negative effects on individuals’ development. In addition, Stratton (2015) proposed an affective events theory-based conceptual model of emotional ambivalence that describes the determinants of emotional ambivalence and their effects. This model depicts the process that individuals undergo after experiencing emotional ambivalence: paralysis, reappraisal, and finally affective-driven behavior(s).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, managers that are involved extensively in both cooperation and competition will feel torn apart between the high demands of both contradictions, and might become paralyzed and indecisive (c.f. Raza-Ullah & : Stratton, 2005. The difficulty increases and thus also the tension when managers have to keep a balance between simultaneous high contradictory demands.…”
Section: Coopetition Paradox and Tensionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These managers can deal with both high and low tensions in a constructive manner as they can utilize their paradoxical thinking to reduce the higher levels of coopetitive tension that might cause managers to become ambivalent or indecisive (c.f. Raza-Ullah & Stratton, 2005). Thus, paradoxical thinking brings down the high levels of tension to a moderate level, retaining sufficient pressure to accommodate simultaneous contradicting demands in their minds, while still functioning effectively.…”
Section: Tensions and Managers' Coopetition Capabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is not only a tool to balance work-life demands (Wallace, 2004), such as connecting with family members through e-mail or conducting personal banking, it has also become a source of illicit behavior that benefits the user and/or harms the organization. Visiting sites that are benign to the user as being inappropriate, such as news or e-mail Web sites, and the traditionally insecure pornographic and gambling Web sites may pose a considerable risk to an organization's information security and legal and fiduciary interests (Stratton, 2005). The vulnerabilities associated with virus infection and data access and manipulation are also likely to increase when users inside the organization open the doors to those outside the computer network (Kuchment & Springen, 2008).…”
Section: The Nature Of Pwu At Workmentioning
confidence: 99%