2016 IEEE International Conference on Automation Science and Engineering (CASE) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/coase.2016.7743550
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An agent approach to flexible automated production systems based on discrete and continuous reasoning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…PAs obtain and update A nm , b nm after querying RAs and obtaining the nominal cost parameters for each state. While the methods to develop and update the necessary RA models are out of the scope of this paper, we envision that existing modeling frameworks, e.g., [14], [60], can be extended to calculate A nm , b nm . For the soft constraint violation cost, the agent associated with each soft constraint, ag sc , provides the a k s f t , b k s f t to the DA-PA. a k s f t , b k s f t represent how undesirable the constraint violation would be to ag sc , in terms of a performance metric k. Currently, the cost of constraint violations is determined using feedback from an operator or a subject matter expert.…”
Section: ) State Costsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PAs obtain and update A nm , b nm after querying RAs and obtaining the nominal cost parameters for each state. While the methods to develop and update the necessary RA models are out of the scope of this paper, we envision that existing modeling frameworks, e.g., [14], [60], can be extended to calculate A nm , b nm . For the soft constraint violation cost, the agent associated with each soft constraint, ag sc , provides the a k s f t , b k s f t to the DA-PA. a k s f t , b k s f t represent how undesirable the constraint violation would be to ag sc , in terms of a performance metric k. Currently, the cost of constraint violations is determined using feedback from an operator or a subject matter expert.…”
Section: ) State Costsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ADACOR provides a formal specification to describe the behavior of its proposed agents using Petri nets [62], [63]. In [21], [70], the internal architectures that enable agent communication and decisionmaking of two types of manufacturing agents -product agent and resource agent -are developed. However, these architectures do not provide well-defined agent capabilities, and thus cannot support quantifiable implemented learning or the communication of these learnings (R1 and R2).…”
Section: B Distributed Control Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PAs obtain and update A nm , b nm after querying RAs and obtaining the nominal cost parameters for each state. While the methods to develop and update the necessary RA models are out of the scope of this paper, we envision that existing modeling frameworks, e.g., [14], [60], can be extended to calculate A nm , b nm . For the soft constraint violation cost, the agent associated with each soft constraint, ag sc , provides the a k sf t , b k sf t to the DA-PA. a k sf t , b k sf t represent how undesirable the constraint violation would be to ag sc , in terms of a performance metric k. Currently, the cost of constraint violations is determined using feedback from an operator or a subject matter expert.…”
Section: ) Agent Association Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%