2014
DOI: 10.1109/tfuzz.2013.2250290
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Agent-Based Fuzzy Collaborative Intelligence Approach for Precise and Accurate Semiconductor Yield Forecasting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Zarandi et al [13] proposed a four-layer fuzzy multiagent system to forecast next-day stock prices based on collaboration among software agents. Chen and Wang [28] and Chen and Romanowski [29] proposed software agents, rather than real experts, for fuzzy collaborative forecasting to expedite collaboration. However, software agents usually follow pre-specified rules when fuzzy parameters need to be adjusted, which may result in unrealistic fuzzy forecasts.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Zarandi et al [13] proposed a four-layer fuzzy multiagent system to forecast next-day stock prices based on collaboration among software agents. Chen and Wang [28] and Chen and Romanowski [29] proposed software agents, rather than real experts, for fuzzy collaborative forecasting to expedite collaboration. However, software agents usually follow pre-specified rules when fuzzy parameters need to be adjusted, which may result in unrealistic fuzzy forecasts.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If o is large, it becomes difficult to optimize NLP Model I. Therefore, Chen and Wang [28] advised choosing o ∈ [0, 4]. When o is a positive integer, the model can be converted into an equivalent QP problem.…”
Section: Preliminary Models For Fitting a Fuzzy Linear Regressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They proposed three aggregation rules: The minimum aggregation rule, the maximum aggregation rule, and the average aggregation rule, for which the degree of consensus was measured in terms of the highest discrepancy. FI is the most prevalent consensus aggregator in FCF methods [24,29]. FI finds out the values common to those estimated by all DMs.…”
Section: Fi For Finding Out the Overall Consensusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most existing FCF approaches adopt a posterior aggregation, i.e., the forecasts by multiple DMs, rather than their opinions, are aggregated [21,22]. If the forecasting performance based on the aggregation result is not satisfactory, the DMs modify their opinions by referring to others' opinions [23,24]. However, existing FCF methods belong to supervised learning methods, while the PCPA-FAHP approach does not because there is no actual value of the fuzzy weight.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been successfully applied to a great variety of different processes such as control engineering, signal processing, information processing, machine intelligence, decision making, management, finance, medicine, and robotics [19]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%