2015 IEEE Power &Amp; Energy Society General Meeting 2015
DOI: 10.1109/pesgm.2015.7285608
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An aggregated multi-cut decomposition algorithm for two-stage transmission expansion planning problems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The partial-cut approach has since been shown to be effective in various applied problems [4,5]. Moreover, the results in [3,9,10] suggest that many problems are solved more efficiently with an aggregation level somewhere between the single-cut and multi-cut, i.e., partitioning schemes S where 1 < A L (S) < n. For instance, in [10], a uniform aggregation scheme with variable aggregation level is adopted in a distributed setting to solve a large problem instance of 1000 scenarios corresponding to 2.5 million variables and 1.4 million constraints.…”
Section: Partial Cut Aggregationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The partial-cut approach has since been shown to be effective in various applied problems [4,5]. Moreover, the results in [3,9,10] suggest that many problems are solved more efficiently with an aggregation level somewhere between the single-cut and multi-cut, i.e., partitioning schemes S where 1 < A L (S) < n. For instance, in [10], a uniform aggregation scheme with variable aggregation level is adopted in a distributed setting to solve a large problem instance of 1000 scenarios corresponding to 2.5 million variables and 1.4 million constraints.…”
Section: Partial Cut Aggregationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was later extended to a multi-cut variant, with better convergence properties on many test examples [2]. Recent contributions have explored aggregation strategies that fall between a single-cut and multi-cut approach [3,4,5]. The aim is to preserve the convergence properties of a multi-cut algorithm, while reducing the size growth of the master problem and communication overhead in distributed implementations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%