2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.119644
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An aggregator-oriented hierarchical market mechanism for multi-type ancillary service provision based on the two-loop Stackelberg game

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to the simulation approaches listed in Table I, some works have explored the use of game-theory techniques [39]- [41] and bidding methods [42]- [44] for the acquisition of AS.…”
Section: Background and Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition to the simulation approaches listed in Table I, some works have explored the use of game-theory techniques [39]- [41] and bidding methods [42]- [44] for the acquisition of AS.…”
Section: Background and Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reference [39] proposes a tri-layer multi-type AS market framework. Compared with the scope of the proposed work, this work does not consider the use of DSM and the AS should be procured in a non-discriminatory way.…”
Section: Background and Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike conventional thermal power generators with static output limits, RE generators are subject to time-variant maximum power outputs (Nguyen et al, 2022a), influenced by fluctuating weather conditions. This variability introduces a layer of complexity to the strategic maneuvers of market participants (Li et al, 2022a;Tang et al, 2022). In response to the intermittent (Xiao et al, 2020) and uncertain nature of renewables (Luo et al, 2022), several countries have enacted policies mandating that RE generators be equipped with energy storage (ES) systems proportional to their generation capacity (Yang et al, 2018;Li et al, 2022b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%