2023
DOI: 10.1145/3571213
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Algebra of Alignment for Relational Verification

Abstract: Relational verification encompasses information flow security, regression verification, translation validation for compilers, and more. Effective alignment of the programs and computations to be related facilitates use of simpler relational invariants and relational procedure specs, which in turn enables automation and modular reasoning. Alignment has been explored in terms of trace pairs, deductive rules of relational Hoare logics (RHL), and several forms of product automata. This article shows how a simple e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 33 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most methods for k-safety verification are centered around the self-composition of a program [7] and often improve upon a naïve self-composition by, e.g., exploiting the commutativity of statements [55,31,32,29]. Relational program logics for k-safety offer a rich set of rules to over -approximate the program behavior [8,60,56,49,28,3,9]. Recently, much effort has been made to employ underapproximate methods that find bugs instead of proving their absence; so far, mostly for unary (non-hyper) properties [50,58,52,47,42,17,62,24].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most methods for k-safety verification are centered around the self-composition of a program [7] and often improve upon a naïve self-composition by, e.g., exploiting the commutativity of statements [55,31,32,29]. Relational program logics for k-safety offer a rich set of rules to over -approximate the program behavior [8,60,56,49,28,3,9]. Recently, much effort has been made to employ underapproximate methods that find bugs instead of proving their absence; so far, mostly for unary (non-hyper) properties [50,58,52,47,42,17,62,24].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%