2003
DOI: 10.1142/s0217751x03016860
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Algebraic Approach to Logarithmic Conformal Field Theory

Abstract: A comprehensive introduction to logarithmic conformal field theory, using an algebraic point of view, is given. A number of examples are explained in detail, including the c = −2 triplet theory and the k = −4/3 affine su(2) theory. We also give some brief introduction to the work of Zhu.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
255
0
7

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 195 publications
(264 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
(179 reference statements)
2
255
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…While irreducible representations and their projective covers are certainly central objects for all Lie superalgebras, some of their properties may differ considerably from what we have seen in the case of type I. We have 29 Using the analogy to the Kazhdan-Lusztig dual quantum group, they have been called Verma modules in [71].…”
Section: Jhep09(2007)085mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While irreducible representations and their projective covers are certainly central objects for all Lie superalgebras, some of their properties may differ considerably from what we have seen in the case of type I. We have 29 Using the analogy to the Kazhdan-Lusztig dual quantum group, they have been called Verma modules in [71].…”
Section: Jhep09(2007)085mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While (ii) is common to all σ-models, the symmetries of WZNW models are necessary to lift geometric insights to the full field theory. Both aspects single out supergroup WZNW theories among most of the logarithmic conformal field theories that have been considered in the past [27,11,28] (see also [29,30] for reviews and further 1 In contrast to some appearances in the physics literature we will use the word "indecomposable" strictly in the mathematical sense. According to that definition also irreducible representations are always indecomposable since they cannot be written as a direct sum of two other (non-zero) representations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonsemisimple fusion algebras are expected to arise in logarithmic models of conformal field theory [7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15], where irreducible representations of the chiral algebra allow nontrivial (indecomposable) extensions. In what follows, we generalize the Verlinde formula and derive nonsemisimple fusion algebras for the series of (1, p) Virasoro models with integer p ≥ 2.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A great deal of effort has been made to characterize and classify abstractly such theories [12,13]. It is fair to say, however, that very few explicit examples are well understood.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is fair to say, however, that very few explicit examples are well understood. The case of c = −2 has given rise to surprisingly complicated results (see [12,13] for a review), while for potentially more interesting physical theories (such as sigma models on superprojective spaces), partial results reveal a truly baffling complexity [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%