1988
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-74282-8_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Algebraic Characterization of STUF

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1988
1988
1994
1994

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…PATR-II (Shieber et al, 1983) is the most basic and a kind of common denominator which other formalisms are extensions of. Other formalisms are STUF (Beierle et al, 1988), TFS (Emele & Zajac, 1990), CUF (D6rre & Eisele, 1991) and, ALE (Carpenter, 1992). These formalisms include, for example, disjunction, various variants of negation and typing.…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…PATR-II (Shieber et al, 1983) is the most basic and a kind of common denominator which other formalisms are extensions of. Other formalisms are STUF (Beierle et al, 1988), TFS (Emele & Zajac, 1990), CUF (D6rre & Eisele, 1991) and, ALE (Carpenter, 1992). These formalisms include, for example, disjunction, various variants of negation and typing.…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The subsumption order for closed feature structures shows how fixed arity feature structures (used in, for example, STUF(Beierle et al, 1988)) can be defined. class fs; isa value; constructor empty; constructor closed; constructor add pair:attribute,value,fs; constraint empty>closed; constraint empty>add_pair(A,V, FS); constraint add_pair(A,U,add_pair(A,V, FS))= add_pair(A,and(U,V),FS); constraint add_pair(A,U,add pair(B,V, FS))= add pair(B ,V, add pair(A,U ,FS)).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…) for the apldication to grammar writing). A second motivation, discussed in detail by (Beierle & Pletat 1988; Beierle K~ Pletat 1989;Beierle et al 1988), is to use equational ADTS to provide a mathematical foundation for h~ature structures. A third motivation, dominant in this pal)er , is to use the AI)T appl'oach lo provide a richer array of explicit data types than are readily admitted by "p'tlre' feature structure approaches.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%