1975
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.72.6.2385
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Algebraic Description of Stereochemical Correspondence

Abstract: It is shown that a stereochemical correspondence between two molecular systems can be represented by a commuting diagram of the point groups and permutation groups involved. The effect of the diagrammatic condition on the mappings of the cosets, double cosets, subgroup lattice, and double coset algebra determined for the two molecular systems by point group to permutation group homomorphisms is detailed. Chemical similarities implied by a stereochemical correspondence are indicated, and six examples are provid… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1979
1979
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Enantiomeric forms of molecules constitute equivalence classes that can be represented by groupoid, rather than group, symmetries, leading to a groupoid version of Landau's classic phenomenological model for phase transition and its extension via Pettini's 'topological hypothesis' [5]. The necessity of using groupoid methods in stereochemistry has long been recognized, and will not be reviewed here [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. For a tutorial on groupoid methods see Brown [14] or Weinstein [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Enantiomeric forms of molecules constitute equivalence classes that can be represented by groupoid, rather than group, symmetries, leading to a groupoid version of Landau's classic phenomenological model for phase transition and its extension via Pettini's 'topological hypothesis' [5]. The necessity of using groupoid methods in stereochemistry has long been recognized, and will not be reviewed here [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. For a tutorial on groupoid methods see Brown [14] or Weinstein [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%