2015
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-23021-4_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Algebraic Geometric Approach to Multidimensional Words

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, Ord(c) = 2 case is special in the sense that c is then a sum of periodic configurations, that is, finitary power series. In general, any configuration with a non-trivial annihilator is a sum of periodic power series [9], but already when Ord(c) = 3 these power series may be necessarily non-finitary [8]. It seems then that proving Nivat's conjecture for configurations of order three would reflect the general case better than the order two case.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, Ord(c) = 2 case is special in the sense that c is then a sum of periodic configurations, that is, finitary power series. In general, any configuration with a non-trivial annihilator is a sum of periodic power series [9], but already when Ord(c) = 3 these power series may be necessarily non-finitary [8]. It seems then that proving Nivat's conjecture for configurations of order three would reflect the general case better than the order two case.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We first proposed this approach in [9,10] to study Nivat's conjecture. It led to a number of subsequent results [6,7,8,14]. In this presentation we review the main results without proofs -the given references can be consulted for more details.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then c = c 3 − c 1 − c 2 is a finitary integral configuration (over alphabet {0, 1}), annihilated by the polynomial (X (1,0) − 1)(X (0,1) − 1)(X (1,−1) − 1), but it cannot be expressed as a sum of finitary periodic configurations as proved in [KS15a]. Figure 3 illustrates the setup for α being the golden ratio.…”
Section: By Induction Hypothesis We Havementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This elegant and apparently simple conjecture has been formulated by M. Nivat in 1997 during an invited talk at ICALP and has lead to various approaches and numerous results. See for instance [CK15, KM18,KS15] for further references and examples of the latests developments on this conjecture.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%