2017
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-11463-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An algorithm based on positive and negative links for community detection in signed networks

Abstract: Community detection problem in networks has received a great deal of attention during the past decade. Most of community detection algorithms took into account only positive links, but they are not suitable for signed networks. In our work, we propose an algorithm based on random walks for community detection in signed networks. Firstly, the local maximum degree node which has a larger degree compared with its neighbors is identified, and the initial communities are detected based on local maximum degree nodes… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Aiming at improving the accuracy of the results and reducing the convergence time while searching optimal partitions, recent research is trying to add some pre-processing steps before community transforming to collect more structural information from the network. For example, the community detection method based on positive/negative connections [15] runs a random walking process in the network and performs statistical analysis on the random-walking sequence. Then, the relationships of the nodes are evaluated as positive/negative for further detection.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aiming at improving the accuracy of the results and reducing the convergence time while searching optimal partitions, recent research is trying to add some pre-processing steps before community transforming to collect more structural information from the network. For example, the community detection method based on positive/negative connections [15] runs a random walking process in the network and performs statistical analysis on the random-walking sequence. Then, the relationships of the nodes are evaluated as positive/negative for further detection.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Community detection in signed networks is also related to our work. For example, [8,16,[29][30][31]45] aim to find the antagonistic communities in a signed network. These works mainly focus on exploring several groups of dense subgraphs and most of them don't have a clear structural definition of their community model, while our work aims to enumerate the clique structure in a signed network.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this experiment, we evaluate our algorithms on synthetic datasets. We use the synthetic signed network generator, SRN, to generate the synthetic datasets with default settings [45,56]. We generate four synthetic signed networks SN1-4 (details in Table 3) in different sizes and evaluate the efficiency of MBCEnum * and MBCEnum on SN1-4 similarly as Exp-1.…”
Section: Performance Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has, however, led us to the conclusion that a residue that moves in counterphase with a group of other residues should not be considered as a part the group, that is, the sign of cross-correlation should not be ignored. As the community analysis for signed networks is still in development (51,52), we decided to avoid negative links in the protein network by focusing on a rigid body detection approach. For this purpose, we used Local Spatial Pattern (LSP) alignment, a method we developed earlier to discover similar spatial patterns shared by different protein kinases (53,54).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%