Advances in Human Genetics 15 1986
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4615-8356-1_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Algorithm for Comparing Two-Dimensional Electrophoretic Gels, with Particular Reference to the Study of Mutation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1988
1988
1999
1999

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Turning now to the potential applications of 2-D PAGE to monitoring, we have recently laid out in some detail not only the current laboratory procedures (Neel et al, 1984) but the current state of computer algorithms designed to read these gels with minimal operator intervention (Skolnick and Neel, 1986). The ability of this technique to detect electrophoretic variants has been adequately demonstrated (summary in Takahashi et al, 1987).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Turning now to the potential applications of 2-D PAGE to monitoring, we have recently laid out in some detail not only the current laboratory procedures (Neel et al, 1984) but the current state of computer algorithms designed to read these gels with minimal operator intervention (Skolnick and Neel, 1986). The ability of this technique to detect electrophoretic variants has been adequately demonstrated (summary in Takahashi et al, 1987).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The visual comparison of the gel of a child with those of its parents, to detect attributes of a child's gel not present in either parent, i.e., a potential mutation, would be extremely demanding, the type of activity guaranteed to lead to a high turn-over rate in technicians. Fortunately, a computer algorithm we had earlier developed for the analysis of protein gels [Skolnick and Neel, 1986] proved suitable, with considerable modification, for the analysis of these complex DNA images [Asakawa et al, 1994]. Among the approximately 2,000 DNA fragments to be visualized on one of these preparations, we identified a subset of approximately 500 for which the coefficient of variation (CV) of spot intensity was Յ0.12, this reproducibility permitting the distinction between spots of normal intensity and spots with 50% intensity with high accuracy (i.e., two-fragment or one-fragment spots).…”
Section: Our Preliminary Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%