2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-22744-9_37
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Algorithm for Hydraulic Tomography Based on a Mixture Model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the parameterization also can affect the number of local or global optima in the solution of the inverse problem, and it also has to do with how realistic the solution is. In order to model the spatial distribution of K, a preliminary study was conducted by Minutti et al (2019) to introduce a new algorithm called the Gaussian Mixture (GM) inversion algorithm, to solve the inverse problem for HT applications. This algorithm is based on the statistical concept of a mixture model, specifically a Gaussian Mixture Model (GMM), which is used to parameterize the K field.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, the parameterization also can affect the number of local or global optima in the solution of the inverse problem, and it also has to do with how realistic the solution is. In order to model the spatial distribution of K, a preliminary study was conducted by Minutti et al (2019) to introduce a new algorithm called the Gaussian Mixture (GM) inversion algorithm, to solve the inverse problem for HT applications. This algorithm is based on the statistical concept of a mixture model, specifically a Gaussian Mixture Model (GMM), which is used to parameterize the K field.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This algorithm is based on the statistical concept of a mixture model, specifically a Gaussian Mixture Model (GMM), which is used to parameterize the K field. In Minutti et al (2019), the results of the GM algorithm were compared to those of SSLE using two synthetic experiments as well as data from a laboratory sandbox aquifer (Illman et al, 2010). This initial study showed the higher accuracy and shorter computational time of the GM inversion algorithm compared to SSLE, but the results were limited to a small sample.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%