2013
DOI: 10.3109/14992027.2013.817688
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An algorithm that administers adaptive speech-in-noise testing to a specified reliability at selectable points on the psychometric function

Abstract: The reliability of the algorithm was verified. A second test is recommended if the target variability is not reached during the first measurement.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
18
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
3
18
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The masker level was kept constant at 65 dB (A) throughout the experiment, whereas the level of the target sentences was adapted using the 1-up-1-down procedure described in Keidser et al (2013b). Each threshold was determined using 16–32 sentences.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The masker level was kept constant at 65 dB (A) throughout the experiment, whereas the level of the target sentences was adapted using the 1-up-1-down procedure described in Keidser et al (2013b). Each threshold was determined using 16–32 sentences.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For each background noise environment, one adaptive track (see Keidser et al, 2013b) was initially completed in the Phonak directional mode to estimate the target level at which 50% correct identification was achieved. This SRTn was used to select an SNR for fixed-level testing.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the first block, an adaptive procedure was used to estimate the 50% SRT (for details see Keidser et al, 2013b). A block of 32 sentences was then completed at each of three fixed SNRs: the estimated SRT, the SRT+2 dB, and the SRT−2 dB.…”
Section: Evaluation Studymentioning
confidence: 99%