2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9991(03)00299-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An all-scale anelastic model for geophysical flows: dynamic grid deformation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
213
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

6
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(215 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
2
213
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because flow across the poles is insignificant in the test cases considered, the boundaries are set at ±80 • latitude to enhance the efficacy of the computations. The EULAG model employs a time-dependent curvilinear framework using a generalized Gal-Chen coordinate (Prusa and Smolarkiewicz, 2003;Wedi and Smolarkiewicz, 2004;Smolarkiewicz and Prusa, 2005). The governing equations (8) are integrated numerically in the transformed space using a second-order accurate, optionally semi-Lagrangian or Eulerian, nonoscillatory forward-in-time (NFT) approach that is broadly documented in the literature; see Prusa et al (2008) for a recent summary.…”
Section: Eulerian-lagrangian Modelling System (Eulag)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Because flow across the poles is insignificant in the test cases considered, the boundaries are set at ±80 • latitude to enhance the efficacy of the computations. The EULAG model employs a time-dependent curvilinear framework using a generalized Gal-Chen coordinate (Prusa and Smolarkiewicz, 2003;Wedi and Smolarkiewicz, 2004;Smolarkiewicz and Prusa, 2005). The governing equations (8) are integrated numerically in the transformed space using a second-order accurate, optionally semi-Lagrangian or Eulerian, nonoscillatory forward-in-time (NFT) approach that is broadly documented in the literature; see Prusa et al (2008) for a recent summary.…”
Section: Eulerian-lagrangian Modelling System (Eulag)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prusa and Smolarkiewicz, 2003, Appendix A) which is solved iteratively using the preconditioned generalized conjugateresidual approach -a nonsymmetric Krylov-subspace solver (Smolarkiewicz and Margolin, 2000).…”
Section: Eulerian-lagrangian Modelling System (Eulag)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The structured grid model is formulated in generalized time-dependent curvilinear coordinates [22,44,31], enabling dynamic mesh adaptivity via continuous mappings [14], and employs unique, nonoscillatory forward-in-time (NFT) 1 high-resolution numerics [28,34] based on the MPDATA (for multidimensional positive definite advection transport algorithm) methods; see [34] for a recent overview and comprehensive list of references. To mitigate limitations of rigid connectivity and extend the range of structured-grid model applications, the key methodologies of the NFT model were generalized to unstructured meshes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is inverted algebraically to construct expressions for the velocity components which are then substituted into the mass continuity equation, producing an elliptic equation for the pressure perturbation. Details of this projection appear in the appendix of Prusa and Smolarkiewicz (2003). The elliptic problem is solved using a preconditioned, nonsymmetric Krylov solver (Smolarkiewicz et al 1997).…”
Section: Model Highlightsmentioning
confidence: 99%