1996
DOI: 10.1007/bf01536395
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An alternative approach to the valuation of American options and applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
31
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
31
1
Order By: Relevance
“…See [51] and [53] for numerical methods which try to solve the functional equation (8) iteratively. The representation in the equation (7) and the functional equation (8) are applied in a number of ways in the literature: Huang, Subrahmanyam, and Yu [38] have employed step functions, and Ju [48] a piecewise exponential function to approximate the early exercise boundary and used the equations to study pricing and hedging of American options.…”
Section: R(t −T) (Rk −δS(t −T))χ {S(t −T)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…See [51] and [53] for numerical methods which try to solve the functional equation (8) iteratively. The representation in the equation (7) and the functional equation (8) are applied in a number of ways in the literature: Huang, Subrahmanyam, and Yu [38] have employed step functions, and Ju [48] a piecewise exponential function to approximate the early exercise boundary and used the equations to study pricing and hedging of American options.…”
Section: R(t −T) (Rk −δS(t −T))χ {S(t −T)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our opinion the following have been prominent ideas: early attempts to obtain approximate prices [58,9], the integral representation of the early exercise premium [51,53,19], the analytic method of lines and its associated randomization method [17], and a homotopy method [80], analytic approximations of the early exercise boundary [20], and Monte Calro methods for American options. We discuss these key ideas and identify problems that need to be answered for further development of their methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As noted by Nelson and Ramaswamy ((1990), p. 418), the simple binomial processes approximation proposed by these authors becomes inaccurate as option maturity is increased. Alternatively, and as shown in Section VI, the integral approach suggested by Kim and Yu ((1996), sect. 3.4) and Detemple and Tian ((2002), prop. 3) is less efficient than the proposed pricing methodology, unless the recursive scheme is accelerated through Richardson extrapolation, in which case its accuracy may deteriorate for medium-and long-term options.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The proposed characterization possesses at least three advantages over the extended integral representation of Kim and Yu ((1996), eqs. 10 or 13): i) it converges to the perpetual American option price as the option maturity tends to infinity; ii) its accuracy does not deteriorate as the option maturity is lengthened; and iii) it can be adapted easily to the context of defaultable stock option pricing models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As argued in Nunes (2009Nunes ( , page 1250, the optimal stopping approach offers a better speedaccuracy trade-off than the pricing methodology of Detemple and Tian (2002)-which is based on the (very time consuming) full recursive method of Huang et al (1996)-and the accelerated recursive scheme of Kim and Yu (1996), for valuing option contracts under the CEV assumption. Therefore, the accuracy and efficiency of the SHP approach for valuing American-style options under the CEV model will be compared against the option pricing framework proposed by Nunes (2009).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%