2017
DOI: 10.1186/s41241-017-0049-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An alternative approach with a low dose and prolonged chemotherapy for palliative treatment of locally advanced, metastatic or recurrent squamous cell head and neck cancer

Abstract: Background: It is expected that about 65,000 new patients will be diagnosed with head and neck cancer in 2017 in the United States. Patients with recurrent or advanced or metastatic head and neck do not have good survival due to aggressive and recurrent nature of this cancer. Moreover, cumulative and residual toxicities from previous and ongoing treatments significantly impede quality of remaining part of their life. Currently available chemotherapeutic regimens for this group are derived from the treatments u… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…But, literature also shows that pembrolizumab, cetuximab, lapatinib, afatinib, and avelumab did not improve disease-free survival [1,6]. Several patients with advanced cancer would not pursue further chemotherapy unless their treatment has tolerable side effects with maintenance of the functional and psychological quality of life [19,20].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…But, literature also shows that pembrolizumab, cetuximab, lapatinib, afatinib, and avelumab did not improve disease-free survival [1,6]. Several patients with advanced cancer would not pursue further chemotherapy unless their treatment has tolerable side effects with maintenance of the functional and psychological quality of life [19,20].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conventional chemotherapy with a combination of two or three drugs is administered for four to six cycles but has to be restricted due to toxic side effects [20]. The functional and psychological quality of life should be maintained for cancer patients [19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Prolonging treatment time while reducing drug dose can be a useful way of potentially minimizing undesirable side effects. A similar approach was applied in a clinical study conducted by Bishnoi et al (2017) on recurrent, advanced, and metastatic cancer; lowering the chemotherapeutic dosage but prolonging therapy to achieve the desired outcomes extended patient survival while reducing undesirable side effects including nausea, neuropathy, fatigue, sepsis, and thrombocytopenia 38 . Similar results have been reported for advanced cancers, with improved quality of life achieved by application of this therapeutic approach 39 41 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%