1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0013-7944(97)00105-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An alternative method for small pop-in assessment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For deeper indents (d>10 nm), a striking difference is observed by varying the vacancy concentration. For stoichiometric VN, plastic deformation is indicated by pop-ins -stochastically occurring displacement discontinuities [41,42] which reflect catastrophic mechanical failures on mesoscopic scales, including crack nucleation [43][44][45] and dislocation avalanches [46]. In contrast, nanoindentation load-displacement curves for understoichiometric VN0.8 layers never exhibit pop-ins.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For deeper indents (d>10 nm), a striking difference is observed by varying the vacancy concentration. For stoichiometric VN, plastic deformation is indicated by pop-ins -stochastically occurring displacement discontinuities [41,42] which reflect catastrophic mechanical failures on mesoscopic scales, including crack nucleation [43][44][45] and dislocation avalanches [46]. In contrast, nanoindentation load-displacement curves for understoichiometric VN0.8 layers never exhibit pop-ins.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the geometries used in the tests performed under displacement control, this value corresponds to an unstable crack growth smaller than 1% of the uncracked ligament. 24 In this way, most of the first load drops in P±V records in ARALL laminates were critical points. When instabilities were smaller than the critical ones, mostly in GLARE 1, fracture toughness was evaluated at the first attainment of a maximum load plateau.…”
Section: Equations For Calculation Of J-integralmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The amount of load drop necessary to be considered significant was proposed in a way similar to pop‐in instabilities characterization procedure given by ASTM E 1820, 21 though conservatively establishing at 2% the slope difference between the straight lines instead of the 5% recommended by the standard. For the geometries used in the tests performed under displacement control, this value corresponds to an unstable crack growth smaller than 1% of the uncracked ligament 24 . In this way, most of the first load drops in P–V records in ARALL laminates were critical points.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Equation 10(a)), as shown in Figure 1(b). This usually appears in coarse grain regions (Berejnoi and Perez Ipin˜a, 1998), where the connectivity of the e-substructure is relatively low (and the value of e accordingly relatively high). In fine grain materials the connectivity of the e-substructure is high and its decrease proceeds continuously or in small steps.…”
Section: Cumulative Damagementioning
confidence: 99%