The perceived intensity and quality of binary odor mixtures are studied in relation to how their components are perceived when presented separately. Subjects judged the perceived intensity and quality of 6 concentrations of pyridine, 6 concentrations of n-butanol, and their 36 possible combinations. The results show that the perceived intensity ofthe mixture can be predicted from the perceived intensity of its components presented separately (R A and R B ) by the Euclidian arithmetic model. The maximum probability of identifying a mixture as a "mixture" is reached when R A and RB are equally strong. An interaction model for mixtures that relates perceived intensity and quality is presented and tested. The test reveals that both the perceived intensity of a mixture and the probability that it will be identified as the one or the other component can, by a simple interaction model, be successfully predicted from RA and RB• What do we perceive when more than one odorant is presented at the same time? Around the turn of the century, this question became quite controversial due to the substantial contributions of Zwaardemaker (1895, 1900/1959, 1907, 1930; for a review, see Olsson, 1993). He advocated that the mixture of two suprathreshold odors, even quite strong ones, are able to suppress each other to an odorless mixture when they are mixed in certain proportions. Zwaardemaker argued that this phenomenon, which he called compensation, was the olfactory analogue to how complementary colors form white light when different wavelengths are combined. However, several authors questioned the existence of compensation (e.g., Henning, 1924Henning, , 1926Nagel, 1897; Skramlik, 1926).Several decades later, attention was again given to odorquality interaction. The related question of whether the components are perceived in the mixture or form a new odor was revived. It has now been investigated with a number of methods, some of which imply different definitions of the problem, and the results have been diverse (e.g., Jellinek & Koster, 1979;Laing & Francis, 1989; Mitchell & McBride, 1971;Moskowitz & Barbe, 1977; Schiet & Frijters, 1988;Schwartz, Rabin, & Cain, 1987). Independent of the type of mixture percept, the mixture quality frequently seems to be intermediate to the quality of its component odors when presented separately (Ekman & Engen, 1962;Gregson, 1980;Moskowitz, 1976;Moskowitz & Barbe, 1977 Typically, the hedonic value of an odor emerges in the first dimension of the odor space as revealed in a multidimensional scaling experiment, and it may be the most salient attribute of odors (B. Berglund, U. Berglund, Engen, & Ekman, 1973;Moskowitz, 1976;Moskowitz & Barbe, 1977;Woskow, 1968). In accordance with the perceived quality of odor mixtures, their hedonic value is also found to be intermediate to their components (Lawless, 1977;Spence & Guilford, 1933;Lawless, 1977; cf. Dravnieks & Jarke, 1980).With progress in the abilities to scale odor intensity directly, a number of studies have described the quantitative princ...