2018
DOI: 10.1109/jtehm.2018.2811458
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Alternative Myoelectric Pattern Recognition Approach for the Control of Hand Prostheses: A Case Study of Use in Daily Life by a Dysmelia Subject

Abstract: The functionality of upper limb prostheses can be improved by intuitive control strategies that use bioelectric signals measured at the stump level. One such strategy is the decoding of motor volition via myoelectric pattern recognition (MPR), which has shown promising results in controlled environments and more recently in clinical practice. Moreover, not much has been reported about daily life implementation and real-time accuracy of these decoding algorithms. This paper introduces an alternative approach in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several studies have also used this paradigm to decode grips and gestures for intuitive prosthetic hand control. In their majority, however, they have been either limited to offline analyses [8]- [10] or only included able-bodied participants [11]- [13], with few exceptions demonstrating real-time control with amputees [14]- [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have also used this paradigm to decode grips and gestures for intuitive prosthetic hand control. In their majority, however, they have been either limited to offline analyses [8]- [10] or only included able-bodied participants [11]- [13], with few exceptions demonstrating real-time control with amputees [14]- [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several solutions have been developed to reduce the interference in the acquired biomedical signals. However, a residual interference of these interferences still presents [ 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 ]. The signal contamination by motion artifacts causes data irregularities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Having an effective implementation of artifact reduction and data imputing on a mobile processing platform allows for investigation into their effects in real-life prosthetic use. We have previously developed an evaluation method using an embedded system in which the subject can report perceived misclassification while operating the prosthesis in daily life and for long periods of time [49]. The Assessment for Capacity of Myoelectric Control [50], the Activities Measure for Upper Limb Amputees [51], and the Southampton Hand Assessment Procedure [52] all provide insight into prosthetic controllability with respect to functional tasks simulating realworld environments, but they are cross-sectional in nature (a single point in time) and are not performed out in the real world.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%