2015
DOI: 10.2136/sssaj2015.03.0121
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Alternative Tensiometer Design for Deep Vadose Zone Monitoring

Abstract: The conventional tensiometer is among the most accurate devices for soil water matric potential measurements, as well as for estimations of soil water flux from soil water potential gradients. Uncertainties associated with conventional tensiometers such as caused by ambient temperature effects and the draining of the tensiometer tube, as well as their limitation for deep soil monitoring, has prevented their widespread use for vadose zone monitoring, despite their superior accuracy in general. We introduce an a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, tensiometers measure pressure [kPa] and temperature [°C]. In order to evaluate soil suction, porous heads full of water were installed on the tensiometers, therefore the pressure measured by the tensiometers was the negative pressure of water flowing out of the porous heads and soil saturation is reached when the measured value is zero (Kandelous et al, 2015, Wu et al, 2015, Panzeri et al, 2022. As regards the ERT profiles, the measurements taken every 3-4 minutes show the variation of soil resistivity, which is related to the increase/decrease of water content (Hojat et al, 2019, Ivanov et al, 2020.…”
Section: Comparison With a Traditional Monitoring Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, tensiometers measure pressure [kPa] and temperature [°C]. In order to evaluate soil suction, porous heads full of water were installed on the tensiometers, therefore the pressure measured by the tensiometers was the negative pressure of water flowing out of the porous heads and soil saturation is reached when the measured value is zero (Kandelous et al, 2015, Wu et al, 2015, Panzeri et al, 2022. As regards the ERT profiles, the measurements taken every 3-4 minutes show the variation of soil resistivity, which is related to the increase/decrease of water content (Hojat et al, 2019, Ivanov et al, 2020.…”
Section: Comparison With a Traditional Monitoring Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although some tensiometer models are currently presenting materials and modifications that enable their utilization in a wider range of ψ m (Kandelous et al, 2015), conventional tensiometers, such as those with mercury manometers, are still being used due to their notable accuracy and sensitiveness, serving as standard equipment for measuring other tensiometer models (Brito et al, 2009;Beraldo et al, 2012). In contrast, this conventional equipment has a drawback in that mercury represents a toxic metal of elevated risk to human health and the environment (Braga & Calgaro, 2010).…”
Section: Formato De Cápsula E Modo De Instalação Influenciando Determmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neste cenário, diversos equipamentos como sonda FDR, sonda TDRs, sonda de nêutrons e tensiômetro, têm sido utilizados para o monitoramento da umidade ou da energia com que a água se encontra no solo, servindo como ferramenta no manejo da irrigação. Dentre eles, o tensiômetro é um equipamento prático, de baixo custo, além de ser o mais sensível e exato para a determinação do potencial mátrico da água no solo in situ (KANDELOUS;MORADI;HOPMANS, 2015;MONTESANO et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified