2022
DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abo0323
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An AMPK phosphoregulated RhoGEF feedback loop tunes cortical flow–driven amoeboid migration in vivo

Abstract: Development, morphogenesis, immune system function, and cancer metastasis rely on the ability of cells to move through diverse tissues. To dissect migratory cell behavior in vivo, we developed cell type–specific imaging and perturbation techniques for Drosophila primordial germ cells (PGCs). We find that PGCs use global, retrograde cortical actin flows for orientation and propulsion during guided developmental homing. PGCs use RhoGEF2, a RhoA-specific RGS-RhoGEF, as a dose-dependent reg… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While there is scarce evidence for other kinases regulating MLC2 function via MYPT in migrating cells, we suggest that AMPK phosphorylation of Ser472-MYPT1 may be a key controller of tumour cell migratory plasticity downstream of mechano-metabolic signals. However, AMPK may regulate Myosin II activity at multiple levels, as AMPK activates RhoA signalling via phosphorylation of RhoGEF2 in migrating Drosophila primordial germ cells 49 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While there is scarce evidence for other kinases regulating MLC2 function via MYPT in migrating cells, we suggest that AMPK phosphorylation of Ser472-MYPT1 may be a key controller of tumour cell migratory plasticity downstream of mechano-metabolic signals. However, AMPK may regulate Myosin II activity at multiple levels, as AMPK activates RhoA signalling via phosphorylation of RhoGEF2 in migrating Drosophila primordial germ cells 49 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Oscillation of RhoA activity has been attributed to a combination of positive and negative feedbacks. RhoA signaling can be amplified by local accumulation of active RhoA through advection (Munjal et al, 2015) or slowed diffusion (Graessl et al, 2017), RhoGEF recruitment by active RhoA (Graessl et al, 2017; Lin et al, 2021) or microtubules (Azoitei et al, 2019; Lin et al, 2021), and stress-induced RhoA activation (Bailles et al, 2019). On the other hand, active RhoA can be turned off by the accumulation of actomyosin (Munjal et al, 2015) and delayed RhoGAP recruitment — often through F-actin — (Graessl et al, 2017; Michaux et al, 2018; Segal et al, 2018), and myosin II-independent ROCK signaling (Ong et al, 2019).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For live imaging of suntag-nanos mRNA translation, we expressed UAS-suntag-nos (WT or SREmut) with a weak Matα-GAL4 (without VP16) maternal driver line to prevent scFv-GFP depletion which can cause artifact (Extended Data Fig. 2) 14,15 . Unfertilized embryos were collected from Vasa-mApple/Matα-GAL4; uas-suntag-nos (WT or SREmut)/scFv-GFP virgin female flies that mated with sterile male flies (male progeny of osk301/oskCE4 flies).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%