“…Constitutive models should be chosen in relation to the type of experiment and application considered, which in this case are indentation and head impact, respectively. Several models have been employed to characterize the hyperelastic response of the human brain, such as those of Gent (Budday, Sommer, Birkl, et al, 2017), Demiray (Budday, Sommer, Birkl, et al, 2017), Mooney-Rivlin (Budday, Sommer, Birkl, et al, 2017), Ogden (Budday, Sommer, Birkl, et al, 2017;Franceschini et al, 2006;Hosseini-Farid, Ramzanpour, Ziejewski, & Karami, 2019;Moran, Smith, & García, 2014;Prange & Margulies, 2002a), Mihai-Ogden (Mihai, Budday, Holzapfel, Kuhl, & Goriely, 2017) and Prasad-Kannan (Prasad & Kannan, 2020). (MacManus et al, 2018) showed that for microindentation tests with large strain and high strain rate (as in this study), the neo-Hookean model fits the experimental data as well as the Ogden or Mooney-Rivlin models, with the considerable advantage of having only a single material parameter to optimize (instead of at least two) (Pierrat et al, 2018).…”