2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmps.2019.103752
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An analysis driven construction of distortional-mode-dependent and Hill-Stable elastic potential with application to human brain tissue

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Constitutive models should be chosen in relation to the type of experiment and application considered, which in this case are indentation and head impact, respectively. Several models have been employed to characterize the hyperelastic response of the human brain, such as those of Gent (Budday, Sommer, Birkl, et al, 2017), Demiray (Budday, Sommer, Birkl, et al, 2017), Mooney-Rivlin (Budday, Sommer, Birkl, et al, 2017), Ogden (Budday, Sommer, Birkl, et al, 2017;Franceschini et al, 2006;Hosseini-Farid, Ramzanpour, Ziejewski, & Karami, 2019;Moran, Smith, & García, 2014;Prange & Margulies, 2002a), Mihai-Ogden (Mihai, Budday, Holzapfel, Kuhl, & Goriely, 2017) and Prasad-Kannan (Prasad & Kannan, 2020). (MacManus et al, 2018) showed that for microindentation tests with large strain and high strain rate (as in this study), the neo-Hookean model fits the experimental data as well as the Ogden or Mooney-Rivlin models, with the considerable advantage of having only a single material parameter to optimize (instead of at least two) (Pierrat et al, 2018).…”
Section: Suitability Of the Constitutive Lawmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Constitutive models should be chosen in relation to the type of experiment and application considered, which in this case are indentation and head impact, respectively. Several models have been employed to characterize the hyperelastic response of the human brain, such as those of Gent (Budday, Sommer, Birkl, et al, 2017), Demiray (Budday, Sommer, Birkl, et al, 2017), Mooney-Rivlin (Budday, Sommer, Birkl, et al, 2017), Ogden (Budday, Sommer, Birkl, et al, 2017;Franceschini et al, 2006;Hosseini-Farid, Ramzanpour, Ziejewski, & Karami, 2019;Moran, Smith, & García, 2014;Prange & Margulies, 2002a), Mihai-Ogden (Mihai, Budday, Holzapfel, Kuhl, & Goriely, 2017) and Prasad-Kannan (Prasad & Kannan, 2020). (MacManus et al, 2018) showed that for microindentation tests with large strain and high strain rate (as in this study), the neo-Hookean model fits the experimental data as well as the Ogden or Mooney-Rivlin models, with the considerable advantage of having only a single material parameter to optimize (instead of at least two) (Pierrat et al, 2018).…”
Section: Suitability Of the Constitutive Lawmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More refined and complex material model definitions, e.g. (Mihai et al, 2017;Prabhu et al, 2011;Prasad & Kannan, 2020), could be used to fit the experimental force-time data collected here, available in the Supplementary material, with the aim to obtain a more realistic representation of the local stress field.…”
Section: Limitations and Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%