14th IEEE Proceedings on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications, 2003. PIMRC 2003.
DOI: 10.1109/pimrc.2003.1260411
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An analysis of a modified point coordination function in IEEE 802.11

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
11
0

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus polls, nulls and ACKs represent a source of bandwidth and energy waste. To reduce the overhead associated to the polling process, a modified operation of PCF was proposed in [9], where a CFP interval is divided into the distributed polling protocol period for uplink transmissions, without any polling overhead, and the real-time traffic downlink period. In [10], [11] a reduction in the number of poll packets is achieved by detecting periods of inactivity of polled stations.…”
Section: Related Work and Motivationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus polls, nulls and ACKs represent a source of bandwidth and energy waste. To reduce the overhead associated to the polling process, a modified operation of PCF was proposed in [9], where a CFP interval is divided into the distributed polling protocol period for uplink transmissions, without any polling overhead, and the real-time traffic downlink period. In [10], [11] a reduction in the number of poll packets is achieved by detecting periods of inactivity of polled stations.…”
Section: Related Work and Motivationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The biggest disadvantage of PCF is that a lot of bandwidth is wasted by sending polls and NULL data when stations have no data to send. In order to reduce the overhead and increase the channel utilization, some works have investigated the performance of the PCF when used to support real-time traffic, and modified the standard PCF [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11].These algorithms don't avoid unsuccessful polling. When a voice packet arrives, the station may transmit it in the next PCF.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various centralized polling protocols and scheduling algorithms (e.g. [14]) have been proposed to increase the channel utilization for the IEEE 802.11 point coordination function (PCF) [1]. The operation time period for each WS is divided into cycles of contention period (CP) and contention-free period (CFP), where CFP is utilized by either the PCF for real-time packet delivery.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%