2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2004.01.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An analysis of creep deformation parameters. Part 2: experimental study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In other words, if the dK/dt outpaces the H diffusion, the HEDE mechanism will decline and da/dtII will decrease with increasing dK/dt. This diffusion limited mechanism is proposed to be responsible for the retardation of EAC at high dK/dt loading rates [30], [36], [41], [79]. Clearly, the current data show the opposite trend of increasing da/dtend with increasing dK/dt (0.1 to 4 MPa√m) for Monel K-500, which suggests that at these loading rates the diffusion kinetics are sufficiently rapid to not be limiting the EAC.…”
Section: Diffusion Limitationmentioning
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In other words, if the dK/dt outpaces the H diffusion, the HEDE mechanism will decline and da/dtII will decrease with increasing dK/dt. This diffusion limited mechanism is proposed to be responsible for the retardation of EAC at high dK/dt loading rates [30], [36], [41], [79]. Clearly, the current data show the opposite trend of increasing da/dtend with increasing dK/dt (0.1 to 4 MPa√m) for Monel K-500, which suggests that at these loading rates the diffusion kinetics are sufficiently rapid to not be limiting the EAC.…”
Section: Diffusion Limitationmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Modern fracture mechanics testing approaches address these shortcomings to enable a more conservative and rigorous characterization of the EAC behavior by quantifying the crack growth rate, da/dt, and stress intensity, K, relationship of a wide range of stress intensity values. Such efforts were pioneered by Dietzel and Clark-Landes and initial attempts to codify such testing are reported in ISO/DIS7539-9 and in an augmented version of ASTM G129 [26], [30]. Recent efforts extend these approaches by using high fidelity direct current potential difference (dcPD) techniques to monitor the crack extension in real-time and feed these data into a software controlled loading system [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%