2012
DOI: 10.1108/15982681211287810
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An analysis of critical success factors for Six Sigma implementation

Abstract: PurposeThe success of Six Sigma implementation is known to depend on a number of critical factors. The purpose of this paper is to explore and analyse Six Sigma critical success factors (CSFs) in the context of Indian manufacturing organizations.Design/methodology/approachAlthough Six Sigma success factors have been amply researched in the global context, in this paper, a maiden attempt is made to identify, through an extensive literature review, the CSFs for Six Sigma implementation followed by their validati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first stage involves the selection of success factors by literature survey and discussion with experts. For this purpose, the attributes for Six Sigma implementation have been identified from the existing literature review (Antony, 2006; Black and Porter, 1996; Snee, 2000; Antony and Banuelas, 2002; Antony, 2004a, 2004b; Antony et al , 2005c; Yusof and Aspinwall, 1999; Wessel and Burcher, 2004; Hoerl, 1998, Saraph et al , 1989; Sharma and Chetiya, 2012; Desai et al , 2008, 2012; Oakland, 2003).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The first stage involves the selection of success factors by literature survey and discussion with experts. For this purpose, the attributes for Six Sigma implementation have been identified from the existing literature review (Antony, 2006; Black and Porter, 1996; Snee, 2000; Antony and Banuelas, 2002; Antony, 2004a, 2004b; Antony et al , 2005c; Yusof and Aspinwall, 1999; Wessel and Burcher, 2004; Hoerl, 1998, Saraph et al , 1989; Sharma and Chetiya, 2012; Desai et al , 2008, 2012; Oakland, 2003).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For any problem identification a detailed analysis of the problem is required. For this research study, the detailed analysis of the literature review (Antony, 2006; Black and Porter, 1996; Snee, 2000; Antony and Banuelas, 2002; Antony, 2004a, 2004b; Antony et al , 2005c; Yusof and Aspinwall, 1999; Wessel and Burcher, 2004; Hoerl, 1998; Saraph et al , 1989; Sharma and Chetiya, 2012; Desai et al , 2008, 2012; Oakland, 2003) and discussion with experts yielded 13 CSFs that are selected as attributes. The description of the 13 attributes is given the Table 2.…”
Section: Application Of Analytical Hierarchy Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Desai et al (2012) ranked linking Six Sigma to the customers as the second most crucial factor same for the small and medium as well as for the large-scale industries for successful implementation of Six Sigma into the organization. In the survey of Indian industries, linking Six Sigma to the employees is mentioned in the survey results of the study conducted by Sharma and Chetiya (2012) in 13 SMEs in the NCR region. Taner (2013), Yun and Chua (2002) and Antony (2005, 2009b) also listed linking Six Sigma to employees as a CSF.…”
Section: Six Sigma Critical Success Factors: a Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the key factors of Six Sigma methodology is the correct selection of projects [7-10]. This process consists about identifying, prioritizing and selecting the project(s) that provide(s) the highest impact on organization goals[11], and is done through the evaluation of a set of criteria such as: Impact on product or service quality, impact on customer satisfaction, impact on revenue growth, project costs, project duration, risks, information reliability; among others[4,12-14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%