1981
DOI: 10.1097/00001888-198112000-00004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An analysis of empathy in medical students before and following clinical experience

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
67
1
7

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
7
67
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“…This association can be explained by the fact that the ability to communicate with patients and understand their concerns (key features in the conceptualization of empathy) is often taken into consideration in the assessments of students' global clinical competence. No significant association was observed between scores of the JSE and grades on objective (multiple-choice) examinations of medical knowledge (Hojat et al 2002a), which was consistent with findings reported by other researchers (Hornblow et al 1977;Kupfer et al 1978;Diseker & Michielutte 1981;Austin et al 2005). In a group of Mexican medical students, significant associations were found between scores of the JSE and academic performance in medical school (Alcorta-Garza et al 2005).…”
Section: E1279supporting
confidence: 82%
“…This association can be explained by the fact that the ability to communicate with patients and understand their concerns (key features in the conceptualization of empathy) is often taken into consideration in the assessments of students' global clinical competence. No significant association was observed between scores of the JSE and grades on objective (multiple-choice) examinations of medical knowledge (Hojat et al 2002a), which was consistent with findings reported by other researchers (Hornblow et al 1977;Kupfer et al 1978;Diseker & Michielutte 1981;Austin et al 2005). In a group of Mexican medical students, significant associations were found between scores of the JSE and academic performance in medical school (Alcorta-Garza et al 2005).…”
Section: E1279supporting
confidence: 82%
“…However, other studies report that health care providers differ in the empathy they display in their interactions in the hospital (Reynolds & Scott, 2000;Wilkes, Milgrom, & Hoffman, 2002). Further studies show that empathy levels decline in medical students as they move ahead in their learning and training period (Diseker & Michielutte, 1981;Neumann et al, 2011). Haslam (2007) reports a number of factors both individual and environmental that precipitate this decline.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(6,10,11,12,17,18,21,23,25, 28, 31 e 33), refere-se à capacidade de entender a perspectiva e os sentimentos da outra pessoa mesmo em situações que envolvam conflito de interesses, as quais demandam esforço para compreender as razões do outro antes de expressar as próprias perspectivas. Um escore baixo neste fator denota uma dificuldade para compreender as perspectivas e sentimentos da outra pessoa, especialmente em situações de conflito de interesses (exemplo: questão 10 -Antes de pedir a uma pessoa para mudar um comportamento que me incomoda, procuro me colocar no lugar dela para entender o que a leva a ter tal atitude).2) Flexibilidade Interpessoal (FI): composto por dez itens (4,5,8,9,13,19,24, 30, 32 e 35), este fator expressa a capacidade para tolerar comportamentos, atitudes e pensamentos dos outros quando são muito diferentes ou provocadores de frustração. Um escore baixo neste fator indica dificuldade em aceitar pontos de vista diferentes e tendência a se aborrecer facilmente em situações de conflito de interesses ou de frustração interpessoal (exemplo: questão 5 -Quando alguém está me confidenciando um problema, exponho minha opinião objetivamente, apontando os seus erros e acertos).…”
unclassified