Proceedings of the 6th International Accounting Conference (IAC 2017) 2018
DOI: 10.2991/iac-17.2018.23
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Analysis of Forward-Looking Disclosures, Corporate Governance and the Ability to Anticipate Future Earnings: Empirical Evidence from Indonesia

Abstract: This study aims to examine the effect of corporate governance, as measured by the effectiveness of the board of commissioners, the effectiveness of the directors, as well as the concentration of ownership to the level of mandatory forward-looking disclosures in the annual report. This study also aims to test the effect of mandatory forward-looking disclosures in the ability to anticipate future earnings in the current stock price. The results of the study support that the effectiveness of directors is positive… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 23 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…FLID is voluntary; thus, corporations are less inclined to report it. The FLID regulations do not guarantee a better level of disclosure, especially given the absence of penalties for noncompliance (Maghfira & Tresnaningsih, 2017). However, these results align with Casas-Arce et al ( 2017) and Hassan et al (2009), stating that forward-looking information disclosure did not affect firm value.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…FLID is voluntary; thus, corporations are less inclined to report it. The FLID regulations do not guarantee a better level of disclosure, especially given the absence of penalties for noncompliance (Maghfira & Tresnaningsih, 2017). However, these results align with Casas-Arce et al ( 2017) and Hassan et al (2009), stating that forward-looking information disclosure did not affect firm value.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%