An Analysis of Health Financial Protection in Ghana

Abstract

BackgroundGhana introduced a state sponsored health insurance in 2005. The objectives of risk sharing through a prepaid mechanism was integral to the design, aimed at addressing the inequities in financial protection. Progress, however, has been predictably slow and complicated. The Scheme coexists alongside out-of-pocket spending, resulting in the persistence of catastrophic health expenditures and impoverishment. This study adds to the comparative literature on health financial protection in Ghana.MethodsThis study analysed data from Round 7 of the Ghana Living Standards Survey using ADePT. Out-of-pocket spending was used as the indicator for living standards. We estimated different headcount thresholds and concentration index for catastrophic health expenditure. Consumption was estimated to determine the poverty headcount and poverty gap. The distributive effect of health care expenditures on the different income quintiles was estimated to determine progressivity of health financing sources.ResultsSix percent of the households incurred catastrophic expenditures. The out-of-pocket health payments share reduced with total household resources. Those in the lowest quintile allocated a higher share of their total expenditures to health. This impoverished a significant proportion. The richer households had a higher share of health consumption. Therefore, the financing share rose the higher the quintile rank. The total redistributive effect of the expenditure on insurance, total expenditure on health and total payments showed an increase in income inequality between households. Expenditures on insurance and total health showed overall higher inequality for the bottom 25% and 50% of the population.ConclusionThe results highlighted multiple technical challenges related to the implementation of policies and interventions on health financial protection. Ghana can leverage its Scheme to strengthen implementation of its current health financing policies and create opportunities for investments in pro-poor interventions and actions. Other supporting social protection strategies and policies can help reinforce the ability and flexibility of poor households to cope with the uncertainties of health expenditures.

National Health Insurance Scheme and household welfare: Evidence from Ghana

“…Prior to the uptake of nationwide health insurance scheme in Ghana, it was estimated that 11.0% of households in Ghana spent over 5% of their total household expenditure on healthcare out of pocket (Akazili et al, 2017). Post health insurance coverage using the seventh‐round Ghana Living Standards (GLSS7) by Fuseini et al (2021) revealed a decline in catastrophic health expenditure to 6%, yet households in the bottom quintile allocated a higher share of their total expenditures to health. Available evidence from GLSS7 revealed that rural poor households (0.25%) spend a larger proportion of their total expenditure on out‐of‐pocket health expenditure compared to their non‐poor (0.19%) counterparts.…”

Investigating the effective indicators on the realization of good governance in border cities: A Case Study of Paveh, Iran

“…Governance, in this context, encompasses the structures and processes used for decision-making and power-sharing in societies, involving dynamic interactions among government, the market, civil society actors, and citizens (Schultz et al, 2015;Lemos and Agrawal, 2006;Rhodes, 1997;Stoker, 1998). The increasing recognition of urban governance's potential in in uencing positive urban development outcomes, especially in developing countries, has led to a more focused analysis of organizational processes and their potential consequences (Hendriks, 2014;Fuseini, 2021). This shift positions (urban) governance as a development paradigm that can address the unstable urban conditions prevalent in the developing world (Yin, 2014;Chen and White, 2021).…”