1999
DOI: 10.1097/00005768-199901000-00021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An analysis of hip joint loading during walking, running, and skiing

Abstract: Assuming that walking is a "safe" activity for a hip prosthetic patient, controlled alpine skiing and cross-country skiing appear relatively safe with respect to the magnitude of loading. However, the skiing activities showed considerably higher mediolateral and anterior-posterior forces than walking. Mechanical testing of prosthetic devices with loading conditions specific to these activities is needed to assess the effect of these force components on hip prostheses and to allow interpretation with respect to… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
59
0
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 123 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
59
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The vertical joint reaction forces were highest in the low ramp positions except at the ankle where the forces were greater in the high ramp position but this difference across the ramps was not significant. Vertical joint reaction forces at the hip, knee, and ankle in the present study were much less than those measured during walking, running, and stair climbing [20][21][22][23][24]. The vertical joint reaction forces at the knee during the elliptical stride were comparable to cycling [25,26].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 44%
“…The vertical joint reaction forces were highest in the low ramp positions except at the ankle where the forces were greater in the high ramp position but this difference across the ramps was not significant. Vertical joint reaction forces at the hip, knee, and ankle in the present study were much less than those measured during walking, running, and stair climbing [20][21][22][23][24]. The vertical joint reaction forces at the knee during the elliptical stride were comparable to cycling [25,26].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 44%
“…As odd-impact exercises involve typically reaction forces of no more than approximately five times body weight [34,35], they are not mechanically as demanding to the body as vertical high-impact loadings, which can produce peak reaction forces from approximately ten up to 20 times of body weight [16,36]. In essence, the softer, mechanically less demanding odd-impact exercises may suit much better for many common people than vigorous high-impact exercises, and thus, feasible exercise regimens may be build on the principles of odd-impact loading.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 Given the substantial mechanical forces that occur during simple activities such as walking, 14,15 any construct intended to fill a cartilage defect should have the ability to carry mechanical loads similar to the native tissue and to elicit a beneficial host response. To achieve these goals we developed a nonbiodegradable porous hydrogel (polyvinyl alcohol [PVA]) scaffold, the composition of which is stable over time and whose mechanical properties can be varied by changing the PVA polymer content.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%