“…The question arises of how common these biases are in more recent human sexuality textbooks. Rind (1995) demonstrated wide-spread bias among human sexuality textbooks in their coverage of psychological correlates of nonadultadult sex, in which they typically exaggerated negative correlates and inappropriately generalized from the experiences of girls to those of boys. Based on these results, as well as the strong moral distinctions made between manman and man-boy sex in the post-1970s era, it was expect- 1996 1993 1991 1993 1993 1997 1989 1992 1994 1987 1995 1997 1997 1993 1991 1996 14, 21-22, 488-89 36, 374 8-13, 17, 20, 22, 247^8, 250-52, 552 275 34, 38-39, 441-44 387 10, 403, 425 3, 12, 19, 34, 396-97, 526-27 368, 573-74, 576 12,199,320,325,331 26, 313-14 ed that other authors of human sexuality textbooks would also tend to commit errors of commission and omission in their use of historical and cross-cultural perspectives on male homosexuality.…”