2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.econlet.2006.11.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An analysis of inflation and interest rates. New panel unit root results in the presence of structural breaks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4 In order to explore this possibility, we have considered several subgroups of countries. We have taken all of the possible combinations of five and six countries, and the values of the CIPS* statistic always allows the rejection of the null hypothesis, the average p-value being lower than 0.01 Thus, this lack of evidence against the null hypothesis matches the results of Constantini and Lupi (2007) [40] and Chang (2007, 2008) [41,42], who reject the presence of a unit root in the inflation rate for different sample sizes of OECD countries using the LM (Lagrange Multiplier) tests proposed in Strazicich (2003, 2013) [43,44], which consider the presence of broken trends in the evolution of these variables. These statistics can also provide evidence against the unit root null hypothesis for the nominal interest rates, as is reflected in Gadea et al (2009) [45].…”
Section: Empirical Evidence From the G7 Countriessupporting
confidence: 60%
“…4 In order to explore this possibility, we have considered several subgroups of countries. We have taken all of the possible combinations of five and six countries, and the values of the CIPS* statistic always allows the rejection of the null hypothesis, the average p-value being lower than 0.01 Thus, this lack of evidence against the null hypothesis matches the results of Constantini and Lupi (2007) [40] and Chang (2007, 2008) [41,42], who reject the presence of a unit root in the inflation rate for different sample sizes of OECD countries using the LM (Lagrange Multiplier) tests proposed in Strazicich (2003, 2013) [43,44], which consider the presence of broken trends in the evolution of these variables. These statistics can also provide evidence against the unit root null hypothesis for the nominal interest rates, as is reflected in Gadea et al (2009) [45].…”
Section: Empirical Evidence From the G7 Countriessupporting
confidence: 60%
“…Other studies have investigated the stationarity properties of the inflation rate for OECD countries in presence of structural breaks using panel tests (see Costantini andLupi, 2007, Basher andWesterlund, 2008, among others). The inflation rates are computed as the rate of growth of the consumer price index (HCPI) using quarterly data from OECD Prices Indices (MEI) data-set.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Earlier studies of the literature based on single time series unit root tests, such as the standard ADF test, cannot reject the null hypothesis of a unit root (see, e.g.,Hall, Anderson, and Granger 1992;Tzavalis and Wickens 1998). On the other hand, more recent studies based on panel data tests or Bayesian panel data methods tend to reject this hypothesis (see, e.g.,Costantini and Lupi 2007;Meligkotsidou, Tzavalis, and Vrontos 2010). Brought to you by | University of Iowa Libraries Authenticated Download Date | 5/30/15 4:26 PM…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%