An analysis of nontraditional activities at U.S. commercial banks

Abstract

In recent years, commercial banking in the United States has experienced a decline in its traditional business of financing loans by issuing deposits. Simultaneously, banks have become more involved in nontraditional activities that provide financial services and generate fee income. As a result, real aggregate noninterest income has risen relative to income from traditional activities. This paper examines features common to banks that are heavily engaged in nontraditional areas. The empirical analysis suggests that these banks tend to be larger, have smaller net interest margins, have relatively fewer core deposits, and exhibit less risk. These findings have intuitive appeal and conform to conventional wisdom; while larger banks have fewer core deposits and face more competitive interest rate conditions, resulting in narrow spreads from traditional intermediation, they have more diverse sources of revenue and greater access to financial markets, which reduces risk.

The Impact of the Financial Crisis on the Islamic Banks Profitability - Evidence from GCC

“…Rogers and Sinkey (1999) find that bank which are more heavily involved in nontraditional activities and thus generate more fee income reduce their risk exposure to a higher degree than bank that engage mostly in traditional activities. Also, banks that diversify their earnings stream thorough increased fee income may lower the volatility and uncertainly of their income during the crisis, especially if fee income and interest income are uncorrelated.…”

The Sensitivity of Bank Net Interest Margins and Profitability to Credit, Interest-Rate, and Term-Structure Shocks Across Bank Product Specializations

“…This trend likely reflects earnings and product diversification and a greater reliance on off-balance-sheet instruments by these banks in response to deregulation, capital regulation, and financial market developments. 11 Rogers and Sinkey (1999) found that banks that are larger and have smaller net interest margins and fewer core deposits, as is the case of international banks, tend to engage more heavily in nontraditional activities.…”

Evaluating cost and profit efficiency: a comparison of parametric and nonparametric methodologies

“…To the best of our knowledge, only four studies analyze both profit and cost efficiency (Berger and Mester, 1997;Lozano, 1997;Rogers, 1998;Maudos et al, 2002) and not always to serve the purpose of result comparison. Consequently, the above discussion regarding the various efficiency concepts strongly motivates a comparison of the results obtained by the corresponding methodologies.…”