1989
DOI: 10.7600/jspfsm1949.38.175
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Analysis of Physical Fitness in the Aged People With Fitness Battery Test

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
1

Year Published

1994
1994
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
6
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The physical fi tness age estimated is the level of the elderly physical fi tness converted to age scale, so the correlation coeffi cient between physical fi tness age and calendar age is the same meaning as that between physical fi tness and calendar age. Kimura, et al, (1989), Furuta (1992, and Hanai, et al, (1996) have reported that the univariate correlation coeffi cient between the items measured for physical fi tness, different from those in this study, and calendar age was around from 0.2 to 0.5. It is argued that the value reported is in the same level as the correlation coeffi cient between physical fi tness age and calendar age in the univariate regression model revealed in this study.…”
Section: Criterion Validitycontrasting
confidence: 76%
“…The physical fi tness age estimated is the level of the elderly physical fi tness converted to age scale, so the correlation coeffi cient between physical fi tness age and calendar age is the same meaning as that between physical fi tness and calendar age. Kimura, et al, (1989), Furuta (1992, and Hanai, et al, (1996) have reported that the univariate correlation coeffi cient between the items measured for physical fi tness, different from those in this study, and calendar age was around from 0.2 to 0.5. It is argued that the value reported is in the same level as the correlation coeffi cient between physical fi tness age and calendar age in the univariate regression model revealed in this study.…”
Section: Criterion Validitycontrasting
confidence: 76%
“…One the other hand, Kimura et al found no differences between males and females in the agility of body, hands and fingers [11]. Haward and Griffin did not find any sexual differences in the pegboard test.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Males performed better than females in dexterity of hands and fingers involving nerve function [6][7][8][9]. York and Biederman reported that tapping test performances in males and females were almost equal [10], and Kimura et al found no difference between males and females with respect to the agility of the body, hands and fingers [11]. Nagasawa et al examined CFE of the dominant hand in middle-aged and elderly people and reported that males scored better than females [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar results in the present study showed that the greatest and smallest effect sizes were realized on MAT and HG, between male and female players respectively. Also, Kimura et al (30) in a study found less HG statistical difference between men and women compared to the agility of them. The effect size of SET and SAT tests scores were approximately close together and more than handgrip test scores.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%